Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 2;60(1):1-17.
doi: 10.5334/pb.502.

Clarifying the Role of Negative Emotions in the Origin and Control of Impulsive Actions

Affiliations

Clarifying the Role of Negative Emotions in the Origin and Control of Impulsive Actions

Charlotte Eben et al. Psychol Belg. .

Abstract

This critical review elaborates on the origin of impulsive actions and how these can be controlled. We focus in particular on the role of negative events. First, we outline how impulsive actions often originate from negative events that are (emotionally) appraised. A discrepancy between this current state and a desired goal state leads to action tendencies. The urgency of the resulting action depends on the importance of the goal and the size of the discrepancy. Second, we discuss how such impulsive actions can be regulated or controlled e.g. by biasing competition between different options, or by completely suppressing all motor output. Importantly, such control mechanisms might also depend on emotional factors. To reconcile these findings, we present a coherent theoretical framework, taking into account various cognitive, affective, and motivational mechanisms as well as contextual factors that play a crucial role in the origin and control of impulsive actions.

Keywords: action control; emotion; impulsive action; impulsivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of the main theoretical accounts of impulsive action. All theories assume that the comparison between the current state and the desired state (e.g. cognitive comfort) leads to actions. However, the theories assume different reasons for an action being invigorated or not.

References

    1. Amsel, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychological Bulletin, 55(2), 102–119. DOI: 10.1037/h0043125 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Badry, R., Mima, T., Aso, T., Nakatsuka, M., Abe, M., Fathi, D., … Fukuyama, H. (2009). Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(9), 1717–1723. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bari, A., & Robbins, T. W. (2013). Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control. Progress in Neurobiology, 108, 44–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baumgartner, T., Willi, M., & Jäncke, L. (2007). Modulation of corticospinal activity by strong emotions evoked by pictures and classical music: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. NeuroReport, 18(3), 261–265. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328012272e - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg, J. M., Latzman, R. D., Bliwise, N. G., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2015). Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1129–1146. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000111 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources