Operationalization of skin self-examination in randomized controlled trials with individuals at increased risk for melanoma: A systematic review
- PMID: 31917011
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.009
Operationalization of skin self-examination in randomized controlled trials with individuals at increased risk for melanoma: A systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To investigate how skin self-examination was operationalized and the psychometric properties of the scales used to assess this behavior in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing interventions that promote SSE among individuals at increased risk for melanoma.
Method: Eight scientific databases (e.g., Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) and four trial registries (e.g., Clinicaltrials.gov, UK Clinical Trails Gateway) were searched from inception through April 2, 2019. Three reviewers carried out the selection of relevant trials and conducted data extraction.
Results: The review identified 13 unique RCT's. The definition of skin self-exams, extrapolated from instructions provided to participants during the trials and reported in only 6/13 trials, included periodically checking the skin of the entire body, individually or with partners/mirrors, with or without tracking or monitoring tools, and using the ABCDE criteria to identify early signs of melanoma. There was variability in how skin self-examination behavior was measured with respect to item content, number of items, response format, and type of outcome variable used: continuous or binary). No validity evidence and minimal reliability evidence for the measures were identified.
Conclusions and practice implications: Future studies are needed to establish the psychometric properties of measures assessing skin self-examination.
Keywords: Melanoma prevention; Randomized controlled trials (RCT); Skin self-examination (SSE); Systematic review; Validity.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest Alan C. Geller was the senior author of the [35] trial, which is one of the trials included in this review. All other authors declared that they do not have any conflict of interest.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
