Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;103(5):1013-1026.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.009. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

Operationalization of skin self-examination in randomized controlled trials with individuals at increased risk for melanoma: A systematic review

Affiliations

Operationalization of skin self-examination in randomized controlled trials with individuals at increased risk for melanoma: A systematic review

Adina Coroiu et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 May.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate how skin self-examination was operationalized and the psychometric properties of the scales used to assess this behavior in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing interventions that promote SSE among individuals at increased risk for melanoma.

Method: Eight scientific databases (e.g., Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) and four trial registries (e.g., Clinicaltrials.gov, UK Clinical Trails Gateway) were searched from inception through April 2, 2019. Three reviewers carried out the selection of relevant trials and conducted data extraction.

Results: The review identified 13 unique RCT's. The definition of skin self-exams, extrapolated from instructions provided to participants during the trials and reported in only 6/13 trials, included periodically checking the skin of the entire body, individually or with partners/mirrors, with or without tracking or monitoring tools, and using the ABCDE criteria to identify early signs of melanoma. There was variability in how skin self-examination behavior was measured with respect to item content, number of items, response format, and type of outcome variable used: continuous or binary). No validity evidence and minimal reliability evidence for the measures were identified.

Conclusions and practice implications: Future studies are needed to establish the psychometric properties of measures assessing skin self-examination.

Keywords: Melanoma prevention; Randomized controlled trials (RCT); Skin self-examination (SSE); Systematic review; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest Alan C. Geller was the senior author of the [35] trial, which is one of the trials included in this review. All other authors declared that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources