Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Feb;36(2):171-178.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01681-y. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty: predicting outcomes based on different patterns of drug-eluting stent restenosis

Affiliations
Observational Study

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty: predicting outcomes based on different patterns of drug-eluting stent restenosis

Xi Wang et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Although drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty is an effective therapy for drug-eluting stent- in stent restenosis (DES-ISR) after coronary stenting, recurrent ISR after DCB angioplasty still occurs. Different patterns of DES-ISR responding to DCB are largely unknown. This study sought to assess outcomes of different patterns of DES-ISR treated with DCB. From December 2014 to December 2016, a total of 160 DES-ISR lesions treated with DCB were retrospectively evaluated. Restenosis patterns were classified into two groups according to Mehran classification: focal, defined as < 10 mm, 58 lesions (36.3%); non-focal, which were diffuse, proliferative, or obstructive, 102 lesions (63.7%). The primary endpoint was binary restenosis rate at 9-month angiographic follow-up. Secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 24-month follow-up. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Angiographic follow-up rate was 93.7% (93.1% in the focal group and 94.1% in the non-focal group). The focal group had a lower recurrent restenosis rate compared to the non-focal group (3.7% vs. 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.003) at an average angiographic follow-up of 10 (10.4 ± 6.2) months. There was no difference in MACE between the two groups (6.9% vs. 11.8%, respectively; P = 0.70) at (22.7 ± 9.1) months clinical follow-up. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, focal pattern (OR 13.033; 95% CI 2.441-69.573, P = 0.003) and post-procedure DS% (OR 1.142; 95% CI 1.070-1.218, P = 0.000) were predictive factors of binary restenosis after DCB angioplasty. On multivariate analysis, focal pattern of ISR was a predictive factor of MACE (OR 0.260; 95% CI 0.071-0.959, P = 0.043), and diabetes mellitus (DM) was an independent predictor of MACE after DCB angioplasty (OR 5.045; 95% CI 1.179-21.590, P = 0.029). The present study suggests that DCB provides much better clinical, angiographic outcomes in patients with focal DES-ISR than non-focal DES-ISR.

Keywords: Drug-coated balloon; Drug-eluting stent; In-stent restenosis; Recurrent in-stent restenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 7;66(1):23-33 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):165-71 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 1;114(9):1339-46 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1999 Nov 2;100(18):1872-8 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources