Risk factors for delirium after esophagectomy
- PMID: 31919865
- DOI: 10.1002/jso.25835
Risk factors for delirium after esophagectomy
Abstract
Introduction: Postoperative delirium is a common complication after major surgical procedures and affects outcomes and long-term survival. We identified factors associated with postoperative delirium in patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of 378 patients undergoing esophagectomy. We examined the association between postoperative delirium (DSM-V) criteria with respect to baseline variables and postoperative complications.
Results: Postoperative delirium was diagnosed in 64 (16.93%) patients and associated with increasing age (P < .05), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .07), pneumonia (P = .01), transfusion intraoperatively or within 72 hours of surgery (P < .001), and sepsis (P = .001). Unplanned intubation and increased length of stay (median, 14 days) were significant in patients with delirium (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). In a secondary analysis, surgical technique and operative approach were associated with delirium. Modified McKeown (three-hole) esophagectomy was twice more likely to develop delirium compared with Ivor Lewis (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-4.23). The strongest association was found between delirium and open techniques (thoracotomy and laparotomy) as compared with minimally invasive techniques (thoracoscopy and laparoscopy) (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.22-5.76). Survival was similar between both groups.
Conclusions: Postoperative delirium is common and associated with complications following esophagectomy. Identification of predisposing factors such as age and pre-existing pulmonary diseases and proper selection of surgical treatment may reduce delirium and improve surgical outcomes.
Keywords: delirium; esophageal cancer; esophagectomy; perioperative factors; surgical outcomes; surgical technique.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Identification of risk factors for postoperative delirium after esophagectomy: Methodological issues.J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;121(7):1162-1163. doi: 10.1002/jso.25881. Epub 2020 Mar 9. J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32153023 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- SEER Cancer stat facts: esophageal cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html. Accessed August 19, 2019.
-
- Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH, et al. Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:217-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04368-0
-
- Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 2011;28:29-35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000322014
-
- Blencowe NS, Strong S, McNair AGK, et al. Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;255:658-666. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182480a6a
-
- Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:306-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02570-4
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical