Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 13:13:1329.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01329. eCollection 2019.

Baroreflex Sensitivity Predicts Response to Metoprolol in Children With Vasovagal Syncope: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Baroreflex Sensitivity Predicts Response to Metoprolol in Children With Vasovagal Syncope: A Pilot Study

Chunyan Tao et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Objective: To explore the role of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in the head-up tilt test (HUTT) in predicting the therapeutic response of vasovagal syncope (VVS) patients to metoprolol. Materials and Methods: Vasovagal syncope patients treated with metoprolol were enrolled in this study and were classified as responders or non-responders according to changes in their symptom scores before and after metoprolol treatment. Values of BRS in the supine position and at positive response occurrence in the HUTT were obtained, and BRS changes from supine to positive response occurrence were calculated. Differences between responders and non-responders were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the value of BRS for predicting the therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol in pediatric patients with VVS. Results: Forty patients (14 boys; 11.8 ± 2.5 years) diagnosed with VVS were recruited in the study, 28 of whom were verified to be responders to metoprolol and 12 of whom were verified as non-responders. They did not show any differences in baseline characteristics and hemodynamics in the HUTT (p > 0.05). However, the responders had an obviously increased supine BRS value compared to the non-responders (16.9 ± 7.7 ms/mmHg vs. 7.6 ± 3.8 ms/mmHg; p < 0.01). No difference in BRS at positive response occurrence was observed between the two groups (8.9 ± 8.5 ms/mmHg vs. 10.6 ± 9.8 ms/mmHg; p > 0.05). Accordingly, the changes in the BRS of responders were more obvious than in non-responders (8.0 ± 7.8 ms/mmHg vs. -3.0 ± 10.4 ms/mmHg; p < 0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive value of supine BRS was 0.887 (95% CI, 0.779-0.995; p < 0.01). A cut-off value of 10 ms/mmHg yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 82 and 83%, respectively, in predicting the therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol in pediatric VVS patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive value of BRS changes was 0.827 (95% CI, 0.693-0.962; p < 0.01). A cut-off value of 4 ms/mmHg yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 71 and 83%, respectively. Conclusion: Baroreflex sensitivity may predict the response of children with VVS to metoprolol.

Keywords: baroreflex sensitivity; children; metoprolol; therapeutic response; vasovagal syncope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Change in baroreflex sensitivity during head-up tilt test for responders and non-responders to metoprolol.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Receiver operating characteristic curves of supine BRS and changes in BRS from supine to positive response occurrence in a head-up tilt test for predicting the therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol for vasovagal syncope in children. BRS, baroreflex sensitivity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alegria J. R., Gersh B. J., Scott C. G., Hodge D. O., Hammill S. C., Shen W. K. (2003). Comparison of frequency of recurrent syncope after beta-blocker therapy versus conservative management for patients with vasovagal syncope. Am. J. Cardiol. 92 82–84. 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00475-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alehan D., Ayabakan C., Ozer S. (2002). Heart rate variability and autonomic nervous system changes in children with vasovagal syncope. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 25 1331–1338. 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01331.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bari V., Vaini E., Pistuddi V., Fantinato A., Cairo B., De Maria B., et al. (2019). Comparison of causal and non-causal strategies for the assessment of baroreflex sensitivity in predicting acute kidney dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting. Front. Physiol. 10:1319. 10.3389/fphys.2019.01319 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benditt D. G., Ermis C., Padanilam B., Samniah N., Sakaguchi S. (2003). Catecholamine response during haemodynamically stable upright posture in individuals with and without tilt-table induced vasovagal syncope. Europace 5 65–70. 10.1053/eupc.2002.0271 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bertinieri G., di Rienzo M., Cavallazzi A., Ferrari A. U., Pedotti A., Mancia G. (1985). A new approach to analysis of the arterial baroreflex. J. Hypertens. Suppl. 3 S79–S81. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources