Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 20:7:389.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00389. eCollection 2019.

Adapting and Operationalizing the RE-AIM Framework for Implementation Science in Environmental Health: Clean Fuel Cooking Programs in Low Resource Countries

Affiliations

Adapting and Operationalizing the RE-AIM Framework for Implementation Science in Environmental Health: Clean Fuel Cooking Programs in Low Resource Countries

Ashlinn K Quinn et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: The use of models and frameworks to design and evaluate strategies to improve delivery of evidence-based interventions is a foundational element of implementation science. To date, however, evaluative implementation science frameworks such as Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) have not been widely employed to examine environmental health interventions. We take advantage of a unique opportunity to utilize and iteratively adapt the RE-AIM framework to guide NIH-funded case studies of the implementation of clean cooking fuel programs in eleven low- and middle-income countries. Methods: We used existing literature and expert consultation to translate and iteratively adapt the RE-AIM framework across several stages of the NIH Clean Cooking Implementation Science case study project. Checklists and templates to guide investigators were developed at each stage. Results: The RE-AIM framework facilitated identification of important emerging issues across this set of case studies, in particular highlighting the fact that data associated with certain important outcomes related to health and welfare are chronically lacking in clean fuel programs. Monitoring of these outcomes should be prioritized in future implementation efforts. As RE-AIM was not originally designed to evaluate household energy interventions, employing the framework required adaptation. Specific adaptations include the broadening of Effectiveness to encompass indicators of success toward any stated programmatic goal, and expansion of Adoption to include household-level uptake of technology. Conclusions: The RE-AIM implementation science framework proved to be a useful organizing schema for 11 case studies of clean fuel cooking programs, in particular highlighting areas requiring emphasis in future research and evaluation efforts. The iterative approach used here to adapt an implementation science framework to a specific programmatic goal may be of value to other multi-country program efforts, such as those led by international development agencies. The checklists and templates developed for this project are publicly available for others to use and/or further modify.

Keywords: RE-AIM; case studies; clean cooking; household air pollution; implementation science; program evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of activities.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of RE-AIM data availability across 11 case studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Case Study Developers' surveyed responses to questions about the conceptual challenge of, and difficulty gathering data for, the five RE-AIM dimensions. N = 18 responses.

Comment in

References

    1. GBD 2016 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016 - the lancet. Lancet. (2017) 390:1345–422. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Who Indoor Air Quality Guidelines: Household Fuel Combustion. (2014). Available online at: http://www.who.int/indoorair/guidelines/hhfc/HHFC_guidelines.pdf - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal J, Quinn A, Grieshop AP, Pillarisetti A, Glass RI. Clean cooking and the sdgs: Integrated analytical approaches to guide energy interventions for health and environment goals. Energy Sust Dev. (2018) 42:152–9. 10.1016/j.esd.2017.11.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Champion WM, Grieshop AP. Pellet-fed gasifier stoves approach gas-stove like performance during in-home use in Rwanda. Environ Sci Technol. (2019) 53:6570–79. 10.1021/acs.est.9b00009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malla S, Timilsina GR. Household cooking fuel choice and adoption of improved cookstoves in developing countries: a review. In: Policy Research Working Paper Series 6903. The World Bank; (2014). 10.1596/1813-9450-6903 - DOI