Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 12:6:446.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00446. eCollection 2019.

Controlling Endemic Neospora caninum-Related Abortions in a Dairy Herd From Argentina

Affiliations

Controlling Endemic Neospora caninum-Related Abortions in a Dairy Herd From Argentina

Horacio Lagomarsino et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

After diagnosis of endemic abortions due to neosporosis in a commercial dairy farm, routes of Neospora caninum-transmission were evaluated in order to choose the best strategy for reducing its seroprevalence and related abortions. Fifty two dam-calf pairs were bled at parturition. Additionally, 22 female calves were also sampled at regular 3 month intervals until 18-22 months. N. caninum specific antibodies were assayed by IFAT. Serum samples were tested at a dilution 1:25 for calves before colostrum intake and heifers before mating and 1:100 for multiparous cows. Only serum samples from IFAT seropositive cattle involved in the evaluation of the routes of transmission were assessed by a commercial IgG avidity ELISA. Seropositive cows or heifers were artificially inseminated with semen from Hereford bulls. The progenies from these female animals were sent to a feed lot to produce meat. Different generalized linear models (GLM) were used to study the relationship between abortion, age category, and serostatus. Seropositive heifers were more likely to have a record of abortion (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.6-4.7). Vertical transmission frequency was 55.5% (5 seropositive calves/9 seropositive cows). Horizontal transmission was 22.7% (5 female calves seroconverted at least one time/22 females calves sampled during 24 months) and these 5 female calves had low avidity. In heifers, both seroprevalence and abortion rates decreased from 22.1 and 8.4% of 475 in 2009 to 6.1 and 4.3% of 578 in 2015, respectively (p < 0.01). Over 5 years, N. caninum-seroprevalence and the related abortions in heifers decreased after the control strategy was assessed.

Keywords: bovine; control; management; protozoa; reproductive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
N. caninum seroprevalence probability values estimated in dairy heifers over time after applying the control management in 2011. The estimated values and CI95% were obtained from GLM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Abortion probability values on dairy heifers and cows over time after applying the control management in 2011. The estimated values and CI95% were obtained from GLM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reichel MP, Ayanegui-Alcérreca MA, Gondim LFP, Ellis JT. What is the global economic impact of Neospora caninum in cattle – The billion dollar question. Int J Parasitol. (2013) 43:133–42. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.10.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson ML, Reynolds JP, Rowe JD, Sverlow KW, Packham AE, Barr BC, et al. . Evidence of vertical transmission of Neospora sp infection in dairy cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1997) 210:1169–72. - PubMed
    1. Moré G, Bacigalupe D, Basso W, Rambeaud M, Beltrame F, Ramirez B, et al. . Frequency of horizontal and vertical transmission for Sarcocystis cruzi and Neospora caninum in dairy cattle. Vet Parasitol. (2009) 160:51–4. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.081 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McAllister MM, Björkman C, Anderson-Sprecher R, Rogers DG. Evidence of point-source exposure to Neospora caninum and protective immunity in a herd of beef cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2000) 217:881–7. 10.2460/javma.2000.217.881 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dijkstra T, Barkema HW, Eysker M, Wouda W. Evidence of postnatal transmission of Neospora caninum in Dutch dairy herds. Int J Parasitol. (2001) 31:209–15. 10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00160-0 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources