Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;19(1):92-107.
doi: 10.1002/wps.20701.

A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression

Affiliations

A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression

Pim Cuijpers et al. World Psychiatry. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

No network meta-analysis has examined the relative effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression, while this is a very important clinical issue. We conducted systematic searches in bibliographical databases to identify randomized trials in which a psychotherapy and a pharmacotherapy for the acute or long-term treatment of depression were compared with each other, or in which the combination of a psychotherapy and a pharmacotherapy was compared with either one alone. The main outcome was treatment response (50% improvement between baseline and endpoint). Remission and acceptability (defined as study drop-out for any reason) were also examined. Possible moderators that were assessed included chronic and treatment-resistant depression and baseline severity of depression. Data were pooled as relative risk (RR) using a random-effects model. A total of 101 studies with 11,910 patients were included. Depression in most studies was moderate to severe. In the network meta-analysis, combined treatment was more effective than psychotherapy alone (RR=1.27; 95% CI: 1.14-1.39) and pharmacotherapy alone (RR=1.25; 95% CI: 1.14-1.37) in achieving response at the end of treatment. No significant difference was found between psychotherapy alone and pharmacotherapy alone (RR=0.99; 95% CI: 0.92-1.08). Similar results were found for remission. Combined treatment (RR=1.23; 95% CI: 1.05-1.45) and psychotherapy alone (RR=1.17; 95% CI: 1.02-1.32) were more acceptable than pharmacotherapy. Results were similar for chronic and treatment-resistant depression. The combination of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy seems to be the best choice for patients with moderate depression. More research is needed on long-term effects of treatments (including cost-effectiveness), on the impact of specific pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, and on the effects in specific populations of patients.

Keywords: Depression; acceptability; antidepressants; chronic depression; cognitive behavior therapy; combined treatment; interpersonal therapy; network meta-analysis; pharmacotherapy; psychotherapy; treatment-resistant depression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart for inclusion of studies. RCT – randomized clinical trial
Figure 2
Figure 2
Network plot for response to psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, combination of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, combination of psychotherapy and placebo, and placebo only in depression. The nodes and edges are weighted according to the number of participants and comparisons.

References

    1. Jorm AF, Patten SB, Brugha TS et al. Has increased provision of treatment reduced the prevalence of common mental disorders? Review of the evidence from four countries. World Psychiatry 2017;16:90‐9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD 2016. Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990‐2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017;390:1211‐59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Docherty M, Shaw K, Goulding L et al. Evidence‐based guideline implementation in low and middle income countries: lessons for mental health care. Int J Ment Health Syst 2017;11:8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cipriani A, Tomlinson A. Providing the most appropriate care to our individual patients. Evid Based Ment Health 2019;22:1‐2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cuijpers P, Karyotaki E, Reijnders M et al. Who benefits from psychotherapies for adult depression? A meta‐analytic update of the evidence. Cogn Behav Ther 2018;47:91‐106. - PubMed