Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Still a Mystery More Than Half a Century Later
- PMID: 31923077
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003674
Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Still a Mystery More Than Half a Century Later
Comment in
-
Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Still a Mystery More Than Half a Century Later.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;135(6):1487-1488. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003914. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32443072 No abstract available.
-
In Reply.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;135(6):1488. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003915. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32443073 No abstract available.
References
-
- Ananth CV, Chaulan SP, Chen HY, D'Alton ME, Vintzileos AM. Electronic fetal monitoring in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:927–33.
-
- Bloom SL, Spong CY, Thom E, Varner MW, Rouse DJ, Weininger S, et al. Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2195–202.
-
- Belfort MA, Saade GR, Thom E, Blackwell SC, Reddy UM, Thorp JM, et al. A trial of intrapartum fetal ECG ST-segment analysis. N Engl J Med 2015;373:632–41.
-
- Grimes DA, Peipert JF. Electronic fetal monitoring as a public health screening program: the arithmetic failure. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1397–400.
-
- Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML. Continuous cardiocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD006066. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
