Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;43(3):242-250.
doi: 10.1002/clc.23308. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

Defining and managing patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Sorting through type 1 vs other types

Affiliations
Review

Defining and managing patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Sorting through type 1 vs other types

Marc Cohen et al. Clin Cardiol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Advances in cardiovascular (CV) imaging, redefined electrocardiogram criteria, and high-sensitivity CV biomarker assays have enabled more differentiated etiological classification of myocardial infarction (MI). Type 1 MI has a different underlying pathophysiology than type 2 through type 5 MI; type 1 MI is characterized primarily by intracoronary atherothrombosis and the other types by a variety of mechanisms, which can occur with or without an atherosclerotic component. In type 2 MI, there is evidence of myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance unrelated to acute coronary atherothrombosis. Types 1 and 2 MI are spontaneous events, while type 4 and type 5 are procedure-related; type 3 MI is identified only after death. Most type 1 and type 2 MI present as non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI), although both types can also present as ST-elevation MI. Because of their different underlying etiologies, type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI have different presentation and prognosis and should be managed differently. In this article, we discuss the epidemiology, prognosis, and management of NSTEMI occurring in the setting of underlying type 1 or type 2 pathophysiology. Most NSTEMI (65%-90%) are type 1 MI. Patients with type 2 MI have multiple comorbidities and causes of in-hospital mortality among these patients are not always CV-related. It is important to distinguish between type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI early in the clinical course to allow for the use of the most appropriate treatments that will provide the greatest benefit for these patients.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; anticoagulant; antiplatelet; myocardial infarction; non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction; revascularization; type 1 myocardial infarction; type 2 myocardial infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Marc Cohen has received honoraria as a member of the Speakers Bureau for AstraZeneca.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classification of myocardial infarction based on the fourth universal definition.5 CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD, coronary artery disease; ECG, electrocardiogram; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention
Figure 2
Figure 2
Algorithm for the management of non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction. Adapted with permission from Amsterdam et al1 aPatients treated with fondaparinux should also receive an anticoagulant that inhibits factor IIa at the time of PCI to reduce the risk of catheter thrombosis. bBivalirudin (class I, LOE B) is also recommended for patients undergoing an early invasive strategy but is only used in the catheterization laboratory. Fondaparinux (class I, LOE B) is not routinely recommended; patients treated with fondaparinux should also receive an anticoagulant that inhibits factor IIa at the time of PCI to reduce the risk of catheter thrombosis. ASA, aspirin; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; cath, cardiac catheterization; d, days; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; GPI, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor; h, hours; LOE, level of evidence; mo, months; NSTEMI, non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; pts, patients; UFH, unfractionated heparin
Figure 3
Figure 3
A proposed framework for management of type 2 myocardial infarction. Adapted with permission from Januzzi and Sandoval.50 CAD, coronary artery disease

References

    1. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(24):e139‐e228. - PubMed
    1. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362‐e425. - PubMed
    1. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST‐segment elevation: Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST‐segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(3):267‐315. - PubMed
    1. Khan AR, Golwala H, Tripathi A, et al. Impact of total occlusion of culprit artery in acute non‐ST elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(41):3082‐3089. - PubMed
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019;40:237‐269. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources