Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 10;11(1):220.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14046-9.

Arf1-mediated lipid metabolism sustains cancer cells and its ablation induces anti-tumor immune responses in mice

Affiliations

Arf1-mediated lipid metabolism sustains cancer cells and its ablation induces anti-tumor immune responses in mice

Guohao Wang et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) may be responsible for treatment resistance, tumor metastasis, and disease recurrence. Here we demonstrate that the Arf1-mediated lipid metabolism sustains cells enriched with CSCs and its ablation induces anti-tumor immune responses in mice. Notably, Arf1 ablation in cancer cells induces mitochondrial defects, endoplasmic-reticulum stress, and the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which recruit and activate dendritic cells (DCs) at tumor sites. The activated immune system finally elicits antitumor immune surveillance by stimulating T-cell infiltration and activation. Furthermore, TCGA data analysis shows an inverse correlation between Arf1 expression and T-cell infiltration and activation along with patient survival in various human cancers. Our results reveal that Arf1-pathway knockdown not only kills CSCs but also elicits a tumor-specific immune response that converts dying CSCs into a therapeutic vaccine, leading to durable benefits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Arf1 knockdown reduces the CSC and extends the lifespan of Lgr5/Apc mice.
a LacZ-stained sections of intestine from an Axin2-CreER/Rosa26R or an Axin2-CreER/Rosa26R/Arf1f/f mouse that was treated with five intraperitoneal injections of tamoxifen to activate stem-cell-specific Cre and facilitate the loss of Arf1. b Lgr5/Apc or Lgr5/Apc/Arf1 mice were treated with three continued intraperitoneal injection of tamoxifen to activate the stem-cell-specific Cre and facilitate the loss of Apc and Arf1. β-Catenin and GFP mark stem cells. c Intestinal tumor number in the indicated genotypes (n = 15 mice per group; ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeated three independent times). d Percent survival curves of mice with the indicated genotypes (n = 15 mice per group; ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeated three independent times). e, f Electron microscopy sections of mouse intestinal crypts with the indicated genotypes. g Immunofluorescent staining of CD3, GFP, and Hoechst in intestinal sections of mice with the indicated genotypes. h Quantification of infiltrated CD3+ T cells in mice with the indicated genotypes (n = 15 mice per group; n.s. is not significant, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeated three independent times). Each experiment replicate three times. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Scale bars are as indicated.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Arf1 ablation induces the infiltration and activation of immune cells in Lgr5/Apc mice.
a, b Immunofluorescent staining of GFP and CD8a (a) or CD4 (b) in the intestine of the indicated mice. ce Flow cytometric analysis of gut APCs: DCs (c), inflammatory DCs (d), and macrophages (e) (n = 3 mice each group; **p < 0.01, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). fm Flow cytometric analysis of the immune cells of LPLs: CD4+ T cells (f), IFNγ+CD4+ T cells (g), CD8+ T cells (h), IFNγ+CD8+ T cells (i), γδ T cells (j), NK cells (k), Treg cells (l), and IL-13+ CD4+ T cells, (m) (n = 3 or 5). np Flow cytometric analysis of the immune cells of IELs: CD4+ T cells (n), CD8αβ+ T cells (o), and CD8αα+ T cells (p) (n = 5 mice per group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). qu Relative gene expression of the indicated chemokines, cytokines, and granzymes (n = 5 mice each group, repeat two independent experiments). v Immunofluorescent staining of GFP and pZap70 in the intestine of the indicated mice (n = 5 mice each group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). Each experiment replicate two times. Data are shown as the mean ±  SEM. Scale bars are as indicated.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Arf1 inhibition induces anti-tumor immune responses in MYC-ON liver tumor mice.
a Experimental setup for the MYC-ON mice. b Representative liver images of MYC-OFF or MYC-ON mice treated with DMSO, GCA, or BFA. c, d Liver surface tumor counts (c) and survival curves (d) of mice with the indicated treatments (n = 15 mice each group; ***p < 0.001, t-test; pooled two independent experiments). e Representative liver images of MYC-ON/Axin2-CreER/Arf1f/+ or MYC-ON/Axin2-CreER/Arf1f/f mice. f Liver surface tumor counts of e (n = 8 mice each group; ***p < 0.001, t-test; polled repeat two independent times). gi Arf1 inhibition induces the expression of CD8 and CD4 in the liver of MYC-ON liver tumor mice (n = 13 mice each group; ***p < 0.001, t-test; polled repeat three independent times). j Arf1 inhibition induces the expression of MHC-I and MHC II in the liver of MYC-ON liver tumor mice (n = 13 mice each group; ***p < 0.001, t-test; polled repeat three independent times). Data are shown as the mean ±  SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t-test. Scale bars are as indicated.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Prolonged survival of Lgr5/Apc and MYC-ON mice depends on the T cells.
a Intestinal tumor number in mice of the indicated genotypes treated with anti-CD4 (CD4) or/and anti-CD8 (CD8) antibodies. b Survival curves of mice with the indicated genotypes and treatments (n = 5 mice each group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). c Experimental setup for MYC-ON liver tumor mice treated with the indicated reagents. d Representative liver images of MYC-ON mice treated with the indicated reagents. Scale bars: 2.0 cm. e Liver surface tumor counts of MYC-ON treated with the indicated reagents (n = 10 mice per group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, t-test; pooled two independent experiments). f Survival curves of MYC-ON mice treated with the indicated reagents (n = 10 mice per group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, t-test; pooled two independent experiments). g Immunohistochemical staining of GFP in the indicated genotypes (n = 5 mice per group). hi Percent of survival (h) and intestine tumor number (i) in the indicated mice (n = 5 mice each group; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t-test.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Arf1 inhibition triggers ER stress and induces DAMPs and DC infiltration.
ae Huh-7 cells were treated with control DMSO or GCA and then injected into athymic nude mice. After 3 weeks, the tumors from the treated cells were excised and stained for molecular markers. Calr, HMGB1, ERp46, and the lysosome protein LAMP1 were dramatically induced in the GCA-treated tumors (a and b). Nuclear HMGB1 moved to the extracellular space (b). The ER stress marker peIF2α and the ERp46 receptor PEAR1 were also significantly increased in GCA-treated tumors (c and d). Cleaved and active Caspase 1 p20 but not cleaved Caspase 3 was also dramatically induced in the GCA-treated tumor (e). f, g Direct treatment of Huh-7 cells with GCA induced the expression and translocation of HMGB1 (f) and the translocation of Calr (g) from the nucleus to the extracellular space. h Treatment of Huh-7 cells with the Arf1 inhibitor BFA or GCA induced ATP secretion from control but not Arf1 (sh-Arf1) knockdown cells (n = 5 wells cell each group, *p < 0.05, t-test; repeat three independent experiments). i Treatment of mice with Arf1 inhibitor GCA increased ATP release in vivo. j, k LRP1 and CD11c expression in the intestine of Lgr5/Apc or Lgr5/Arf1/Apc mice. l LRP1 and CD11c expression in the liver of MYC-ON liver tumor mice treated with the indicated reagents. Each experiment replicates three times. Data are shown as the mean ± /SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test. Scale bars are as indicated.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Arf1 ablation induces anti-tumor immune responses through DAMPs.
a Experimental setup for Lgr5/Arf1/Apc mice. TAM: injection of tamoxifen. b Tumor numbers in mice treated with the indicated inhibitors. c Survival curves of Lgr5/Arf1/Apc mice treated with the indicated reagents (n = 5 mice each group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). d Experimental setup for the MYC-ON liver tumor mice. e Representative liver images of MYC-ON mice treated with the indicated reagents. f Number of liver surface tumors in MYC-ON mice treated with the indicated inhibitors (n = 5 mice per group; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). g Tumor weight of wild-type or Rag1-KO C57BL/6J mice receiving B16-F10 cells treated with the indicated sh-RNAs (sh-Scram and sh-Arf1 in WT group, sh-Scram in Rag-KO group, n = 10 mice each group; sh-Arf1 in Rag-KO group, n = 9 mice; ***p < 0.001, t-test; polled two independent experiments). h Tumor weight of wild-type or IFNγ-KO BALB/c mice receiving CT26 cells treated with the indicated sh-RNAs (n = 10 mice each group; *p < 0.05, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). i Tumor weight of wild-type or DCs-KO C57BL/6J mice receiving B16-F10 cells treated with the indicated sh-RNAs (sh-Scram/WT, n = 8 mice; sh-Arf1/WT, n = 10 mice; sh-Scram/DCs-KO and sh-Arf1/DCs-KO, n = 7 mice; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). j Tumor weight of wild-type or P2RX7-KO C57BL/6J mice receiving B16-F10 cells treated with the indicated sh-RNAs (sh-Scram/WT, n = 9 mice; sh-Arf1/WT, sh-Scram/P2RX7-KO and sh-Arf1/P2RX7-KO, n = 10 mice each group; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). ko Tumor volume curves of BALB/c mice receiving transplants of murine colon carcinoma CT26 cells treated with the indicated sh-RNAs and inhibitors (k, sh-Scram n = 9 mice, other groups n = 10 mice; ln, n = 10 mice per group; o, sh-Scram/DMSO and sh-Scram/GSK2606414, n = 9 mice per group; sh-Arf1/DMSO and sh-Arf1/GSK2606414, n = 10 mice per group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, t-test; repeat two independent experiments). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Scale bars are as indicated.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Vaccination with Arf1-ablated cells protects animals from developing tumors.
a Experimental setup. B16-F10 cells that were transfected with sh-Arf1 or sh-Scram or treated with the Arf1 inhibitor GCA or DMSO were injected into the left side of C57BL/6J mice, and the mice were then re-challenged 1 week later with untreated B16-F10 cells on the right side. b, c Tumor sizes from B16-F10 cells treated with the indicated reagents and transplanted into C57BL/6J mice. Scale bars: 2 cm. d, e Tumor-free curves of B16-F10 cells treated with the indicated reagents and transplanted into C57BL/6J mice. f, g Tumor-volume curves of B16-F10 cells treated with the indicated reagents and transplanted into C57BL/6J mice. h Intestinal tumor number of mice with the indicated genotypes after treatment with isotype or an anti-PD1 antibody. i Tumor numbers of MYC-ON mice treated with the indicated reagents. j Tumor weights of MYC-ON mice treated with the indicated reagents. k Survival curves of MYC-ON mice treated with the indicated reagents. l Correlation analysis for the Arf1 expression level versus IFNγ signature from a human cancer database. m Proposed model depicting how Arf1 knockdown promotes metabolic stress, the induction of DAMPs, and immune cell infiltration and activation to attack tumors (bg: n = 10; h: n = 10; i: n = 8; j: isotype group, n = 7, anti-PD1 group, n = 8; k: n = 8 mice each group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t-test; polled two independent experiments). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM.

References

    1. Batlle E, Clevers H. Cancer stem cells revisited. Nat. Med. 2018;23:1124–1134. doi: 10.1038/nm.4409. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lytle NK, Barber AG, Reya T. Stem cell fate in cancer growth, progression and therapy resistance. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:669–680. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0056-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shibue T, Weinberg RA. EMT, CSCs, and drug resistance: the mechanistic link and clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017;14:611–629. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.44. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones CL, et al. Inhibition of amino acid metabolism selectively targets human leukemia stem cells. Cancer Cell. 2018;34:724–740. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.10.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh SR, et al. The lipolysis pathway sustains normal and transformed stem cells in adult Drosophila. Nature. 2016;538:109–113. doi: 10.1038/nature19788. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources