Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;55(4):407-414.
doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01825-4. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies

Affiliations
Review

Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies

Amy Orben. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: In light of growing concerns about an increasingly digital adolescence, the academic field investigating how digital technologies affect adolescents' psychological well-being is growing rapidly. In the last years, much research has amassed, and this has been summarised in over 80 systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Materials and methods: Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and key studies are reviewed to provide insights into the state of current research linking digital technology and social media use to well-being; possible future directions and improvements are discussed.

Results: When examining the reviews, it becomes evident that the research field is dominated by cross-sectional work that is generally of a low quality standard. While research has highlighted the importance of differentiating between different types of digital technology use many studies do not consider such necessary nuances. These limitations aside, the association between digital technology use, or social media use in particular, and psychological well-being is-on average-negative but very small. Furthermore, the direction of the link between digital technology use and well-being is still unclear: effects have been found to exist in both directions and there has been little work done to rule out potential confounders.

Conclusions: Reviewing the last decade of reviews in the area, it is evident that the research field needs to refocus on improving transparency, interpreting effect sizes and changing measurement. It also needs to show a greater appreciation for the individual differences that will inherently shape each adolescent's reaction to digital technologies.

Keywords: Adolescents; Digital technology use; Review; Screen time; Social media; Well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Oct;20(10):587-595 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 1989 Mar;83(3):446-8 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2018 May;557(7707):613 - PubMed
    1. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 19;17(1):260 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Aug;148(8):1454-1462 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources