The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Margin-Positive (R1) Esophagectomy: A National Analysis
- PMID: 31926400
- PMCID: PMC7275192
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.11.035
The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Margin-Positive (R1) Esophagectomy: A National Analysis
Abstract
Background: We performed a nationwide analysis to assess the impact of adjuvant therapy on survival after a microscopically margin-positive (R1) resection for esophageal cancer.
Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with R1 resection for esophageal cancer (2004-2015). Patients were grouped by type of adjuvant therapy. Patients who had other margin status, M1 disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation, missing survival, and no or unknown treatment were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival. A 1:1 propensity score-matched sensitivity analysis was also performed comparing patients who received no adjuvant therapy with those who received adjuvant chemoradiation.
Results: Of 546 patients, 279 (51%) received adjuvant therapy and 267 (49%) did not. Patients receiving adjuvant therapy were more likely to be younger, have more advanced pathologic stage, have nonsquamous histology, and have shorter hospitalization. In multivariable analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and chemoradiation were all associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy. In a propensity score-matched analysis of 123 patient pairs, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy (adjusted HR: 0.30; 95% CI: [0.22, 0.40]).
Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy in patients with R1 resection for esophageal cancer even after adjustment for pathologic stage. Adjuvant therapy should be considered in patients with incompletely resected esophageal cancer in concordance with national guidelines.
Keywords: Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Margin; R1.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Key Statistics for Esophageal Cancer Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/esophagus-cancer/about/key-statistics.html. Accessed November 9, 2018.
-
- Casson AG, Darnton SJ, Subramanian S, et al.. What is the optimal distal resection margin for esophageal carcinoma? Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:205–209. - PubMed
-
- Survival benefits of postoperative chemoradiation for lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. - PubMed - NCBI Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24612702. Accessed November 9, 2018. - PubMed
-
- Allum WH, Stenning SP, Bancewicz J, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5062–5067. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
