Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0227334.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227334. eCollection 2020.

Statistical learning for turboshaft helicopter accidents using logistic regression

Affiliations

Statistical learning for turboshaft helicopter accidents using logistic regression

Rachmat Subagia et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The objective of this work is to advance the understanding of helicopter accidents by examining and quantifying the association between helicopter-specific configurations (number of main rotor blades, number of engines, rotor diameter, and takeoff weight) and the likelihood of accidents. We leverage a dataset of 8,338 turboshaft helicopters in the U.S. civil fleet and 825 accidents from 2005 to 2015. We use the dataset to develop a logistic regression model using the method of purposeful selection, which we exploit for inferential purposes and highlight the novel insights it reveals. For example, one important question for the design and acquisition of helicopters is whether twin-engine turboshaft helicopters exhibit a smaller likelihood of accidents than their single-engine counterparts, all else being equal. The evidence-based result we derive indicates that the answer is contingent on other covariates, and that a tipping point exists in terms of the rotor diameter beyond which the likelihood of accidents of twin-engines is higher (worse) than that of their single-engine counterparts. Another important result derived here is the association between the number of main rotor blades and likelihood of accidents. We found that for single-engine turboshaft helicopters, the four-bladed ones are associated with the lowest likelihood of accidents. We also identified a clear coupling between the number of engines and the rotor diameter in terms of likelihood of accidents. In summary, we establish important relationships between the different helicopter configurations here considered and the likelihood of accident, but these are associations, not causal in nature. The causal pathway, if it exists, may be confounded or mediated by other variables not accounted for here. The results provided here lend themselves to a rich set of interpretive possibilities, and because of their significant safety implications they deserve careful attention from the rotorcraft community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Model-building strategy using method of purposeful selection developed by Hosmer et al. [16].
Fig 2
Fig 2. The examination of linearity assumption in the logit for continuous covariate among turboshaft helicopters.
(A) two-term fractional polynomial (powers .5 and 1), linear spline with one knot at 27,000 lbs (12,250 kg), and lowess smooth for MTOW; (B) one-term fractional polynomial (power -2), linear spline with one knot at 50 ft (15.24 m), and lowess smooth for rotor diameter.
Fig 3
Fig 3. The estimated odds ratio for 4B, 5B, and 6B versus 2B-and-3B turboshaft helicopters.
Fig 4
Fig 4. The estimated log-odds ratio for twin- versus single-engine turboshaft helicopters and associated 95% confidence interval.
Fig 5
Fig 5. The odds ratio for 1 ft. (0.305 m) increase in rotor diameter among turboshaft helicopters.

References

    1. Churchwell JS, Zhang KS, Saleh JH. Epidemiology of helicopter accidents: Trends, rates, and covariates. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2018;180:373–84.
    1. Saleh JH, Ray AT, Zhang KS, Churchwell JS. Maintenance and inspection as risk factors in helicopter accidents: Analysis and recommendations. PLOS One. 2019;14(2):e0211424 10.1371/journal.pone.0211424 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herrera I, Håbrekke S, Krakenes T, Hokstad P, Forseth U. Helicopter Safety Study 3. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF Technology and Society; 2010. Report No. A15753. https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/upload/teknologi_og_samfunn/sikkerhet....
    1. Kråkenes T, Evjemo TE, Håbrekke S, Hoem ÅS. Helicopter Safety Study 3b. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF Technology and Society; 2017. Report No. 2017:00079. https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/sintef-teknologi-og-samfunn/rapporter....
    1. Hokstad P, Jersin E, Sten T. A risk influence model applied to North Sea helicopter transport. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2001;74(3):311–22.

MeSH terms