Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 17;29(3):vor.2018.0539.
doi: 10.1089/vor.2018.0539.

Outcome of Robot-Assisted Radical Cholecystectomy in a High-Volume Tertiary Cancer Center in India

Affiliations

Outcome of Robot-Assisted Radical Cholecystectomy in a High-Volume Tertiary Cancer Center in India

Mahesh Goel et al. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part B Videoscop. .

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive radical cholecystectomy is a complex laparoscopy. Robotic surgery is now an option to complete a radical cholecystectomy because of its high definition, magnified three-dimensional view of the operative field, and articulating instrumentation.1-3 Robotic surgery enables a safe dissection in otherwise difficult to access areas such as the porta hepatis. This video reviews the role of robotic surgery in the management of gall bladder (GB) malignancy. Methods: A 28-year-old lady, with no comorbidities, presented with abdominal pain and underwent an evaluation with a contrast-enhanced CT scan of chest and abdomen. The CT scan revealed a mass in the GB with no evidence of distant metastases. Liver function tests were normal and a CA19-9 was 898 U/mL. A robotic radical cholecystectomy using five ports (four robotic and one assistant port) was performed. The procedure started by clearing the hepatoduodenal ligament nodes (stations 8, 12, and 13 with interaortocaval node sampling). The triangle of Calot was then dissected and secured with clips. Next a wide excision of segments 4b and 5 was performed including the GB. The complete specimen was extracted in a bag from a small incision at the assistant port. Results: The procedure was performed in 330 minutes with a blood loss of 200 mL. There were no perioperative complications and the postoperative stay was 3 days. Final histopathology report revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of GB invading serosa (pT3) with negative margins and 4 out of 14 lymph nodes showed presence of metastases. The overall cohort shows 22 robotic radical cholecystectomies for GB malignancy. The median age was 53 years. The average duration of surgery was 270 minutes with a median blood loss of 120 mL. The median postoperative stay was 4 days and the median nodal yield for radical cholecystectomy was 8. The overall median survival at 18 months was 100% with one recurrent hepatic lesion. Discussion: Robotic radical cholecystectomy may offer technical superiority over laparoscopic surgery and is an oncologically acceptable approach with good short-term oncologic outcomes. This type of surgery may require a highly specialized center with adequate experience in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. No competing financial interests exist. Runtime of video: 9 mins 5 secs.

Keywords: gallbladder cancer; outcomes; robotic radical cholecystectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
None
Graphical abstract
None
Graphical abstract

References

    1. Shen BY, Zhan Q, Deng XX, et al. . Radical resection of gall bladder cancer: Could it be robotic? Surg Endosc 2012;26:3245–3250 - PubMed
    1. Georgakis GV, Novak S, Bartlett DL, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME. The emerging role of minimally invasive surgery for gallbladder cancer: A comparison to open surgery. SM Min Inv Surg 2017;1:1007
    1. Chandarana M, Patkar S, Tamhankar A, Garg S, Bhandare M, Goel M. Robotic resections in hepatobiliary oncology—Initial experience with Xi da Vinci system in India. Indian J Cancer 2017;54:52–55 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources