Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 1;16(2):91-99.
doi: 10.1039/c9mo00154a. Epub 2020 Jan 14.

High-throughput quantitative top-down proteomics

Affiliations
Review

High-throughput quantitative top-down proteomics

Kellye A Cupp-Sutton et al. Mol Omics. .

Abstract

Top-down mass spectrometry (MS) analyzes intact proteins at the proteoform level, which allows researchers to better understand the functions of protein modifications. Recently, top-down proteomics has increased in popularity due to advancements in high-resolution mass spectrometers, increased efficiency in liquid chromatography (LC) separation, and advances in data analysis software. Some unique protein proteoforms, which have been distinguished using top-down MS, have even been shown to exhibit marked variation in biological function compared to similar proteoforms. However, the qualitative identification of a particular proteoform may not be enough to determine the biological relevance of that proteoform. Quantitative top-down MS methods have been notably applied to the study of the differing biological functions of protein proteoforms and have allowed researchers to explore proteomes at the proteoform, rather than the peptide, level. Here, we review the top-down MS methods that have been used to quantitatively identify intact proteins, discuss current applications of quantitative top-down MS analysis, and present new areas where quantitative top-down MS analysis may be implemented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematics of labeling and data analysis for (A) label-free quantitation, (B) metabolic labeling, and (C) isobaric chemical labeling.

References

    1. Zhang Y, et al. , Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics, Chem. Rev, 2013, 113(4), 2343–2394. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burkhart JM, et al. , Systematic and quantitative comparison of digest efficiency and specificity reveals the impact of trypsin quality on MS-based proteomics, J. Proteomics, 2012, 75(4), 1454–1462. - PubMed
    1. Kelleher NL, Top-down proteomics, Anal. Chem, 2004, 76(11), 196A–203A. - PubMed
    1. Loo JA, et al. , High-resolution tandem mass spectrometry of large biomolecules, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 1992, 89(1), 286. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xiu L, et al. , Effective Protein Separation by Coupling Hydrophobic Interaction and Reverse Phase Chromatography for Top-down Proteomics, Anal. Chem, 2014, 86(15), 7899–7906. - PMC - PubMed