How colonial animals evolve
- PMID: 31934622
- PMCID: PMC6949043
- DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw9530
How colonial animals evolve
Abstract
The evolution of modular colonial animals such as reef corals and bryozoans is enigmatic because of the ability for modules to proliferate asexually as whole colonies reproduce sexually. This reproductive duality creates an evolutionary tension between modules and colonies because selection operates at both levels. To understand how this evolutionary conflict is resolved, we compared the evolutionary potential of module- and colony-level traits in two species of the bryozoan Stylopoma, grown and bred in a common garden experiment. We find quantitatively distinct differences in the evolutionary potential of modular and colony traits. Contrary to solitary organisms, individual traits are not heritable from mother to daughter modules, but colony traits are strongly heritable from parent to offspring colonies. Colony-level evolution therefore dominates because no evolutionary change can accumulate among its modules.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).
Figures
References
-
- W. Beklemishev, Principles Of Comparative Anatomy Of Invertebrates 1: Promorphology (University of Chicago Press, 1969).
-
- Wilson E. O., The origin and evolution of polymorphism in ants. Q. Rev. Biol. 28, 136–156 (1953). - PubMed
-
- Wilson E. O., The ergonomics of caste in the social insects. Am. Nat. 102, 41–66 (1968).
-
- T. J. M. Schopf, in Animal Colonies: Development and Function Through Time, R. S. Boardman, A. H. Cheetham, W. A. Oliver, Eds. (Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, 1973), pp. 247–294.
-
- Harvell C. D., The evolution of polymorphism in colonial invertebrates and social insects. Q. Rev. Biol. 69, 155–185 (1994).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
