Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan 9;21(2):432.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21020432.

Significance of 5- S-Cysteinyldopa as a Marker for Melanoma

Affiliations
Review

Significance of 5- S-Cysteinyldopa as a Marker for Melanoma

Kazumasa Wakamatsu et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Melanoma is one of the most lethal and malignant cancers and its incidence is increasing worldwide, and Japan is not an exception. Although there are numerous therapeutic options for melanoma, the prognosis is still poor once it has metastasized. The main concern after removal of a primary melanoma is whether it has metastasized, and early detection of metastatic melanoma would be effective in improving the prognosis of patients. Thus, it is very important to identify reliable methods to detect metastases as early as possible. Although many prognostic biomarkers (mainly for metastases) of melanoma have been reported, there are very few effective for an early diagnosis. Serum and urinary biomarkers for melanoma diagnosis have especially received great interest because of the relative ease of sample collection and handling. Several serum and urinary biomarkers appear to have significant potential both as prognostic indicators and as targets for future therapeutic methods, but still there are no efficient serum and urinary biomarkers for early detection, accurate diagnosis and prognosis, efficient monitoring of the disease and reliable prediction of survival and recurrence. Levels of 5-S-cysteinyldopa (5SCD) in the serum or urine as biomarkers of melanoma have been found to be significantly elevated earlier and to reflect melanoma progression better than physical examinations, laboratory tests and imaging techniques, such as scintigraphy and echography. With recent developments in the treatment of melanoma, studies reporting combinations of 5SCD levels and new applications for the treatment of melanoma are gradually increasing. This review summarizes the usefulness of 5SCD, the most widely used and well-known melanoma marker in the serum and urine, compares 5SCD and other useful markers, and finally its application to other fields.

Keywords: 5-S-cysteinyldopa (5SCD); Melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA); S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B); anti-programmed cell death protein (PD)-1 antibody; biomarker; early detection; hepatocyte growth factor (HGF); lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); melanoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Production, circulation, and excretion of melanin-related metabolites. 5-S-cysteinyldopa (5SCD); 5,6-dihydroxyindole (DHI); 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid (DHICA); catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT); 5-hydroxy-6-methoxyindole-2-carboxylic acid (5H6MI2C); 6-hydroxy-5-methoxyindole-2-carboxylic acid (6H5MI2C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Serum 5SCD and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at baseline and treatment with nivolumab (Nivo). Case a—Serum 5SCD at 41 days after the first administration of Nivo was decreased, while serum LDH remained stable. The result of Nivo was determined as a partial response. Case b—Serum 5SCD and LDH at 27 days after the first administration of Nivo were highly increased. The result of Nivo was determined as progressive disease. This Figure was modified with the consent of authors (Omodaka et al., [100]).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The serum concentration of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (A), LDH (B) and 5SCD (C) in non-responders and in responders to anti-PD-1 therapy. This Figure was modified with the consent of authors (Kubo et al. [101]).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Landreville S., Agapova O.A., Harbour J.W. Emerging insights into the molecular pathogenesis of uveal melanoma. Future Oncol. 2008;4:629–636. doi: 10.2217/14796694.4.5.629. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akaraviputh T., Arunakul S., Lohsiriwat V., Iramaneerat C., Trakarnsanga A. Surgery for gastrointestinal malignant melanoma: Experience from surgical training center. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010;16:745–748. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i6.745. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakalian S., Marshall J.C., Logan P., Faingold D., Maloney S., Di Cesare S., Martins C., Fernandes B.F., Burnier M.N., Jr. Molecular pathways mediating liver metastasis in patients with uveal melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:951–956. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2630. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rigel D.S., Russak J., Friedman R. The evolution of melanoma diagnosis: 25 years beyond the ABCDs. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2010;60:301–316. doi: 10.3322/caac.20074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seetharamu N., Ott P.A., Pavlick A.C. Mucosal melanoma: A case-based review of the literature. Oncologist. 2010;15:772–781. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0067. - DOI - PMC - PubMed