Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 10;9(1):192.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9010192.

An Efficient Photodynamic Therapy Treatment for Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Affiliations

An Efficient Photodynamic Therapy Treatment for Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Alexandre Quilbe et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

To date, pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ADKP) is a devastating disease for which the incidence rate is close to the mortality rate. The survival rate has evolved only 2-5% in 45 years, highlighting the failure of current therapies. Otherwise, the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT), based on the use of an adapted photosensitizer (PS) has already proved its worth and has prompted a growing interest in the field of oncology. We have developed a new photosensitizer (PS-FOL/PS2), protected by a recently published patent (WO2019 016397-A1, 24 January 2019). This photosensitizer is associated with an addressing molecule (folic acid) targeting the folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) with a high affinity. Folate binds to FOLR1, in a specific way, expressed in 100% of ADKP or over-expressed in 30% of cases. The first objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of this PS2-PDT in four ADKP cell lines: Capan-1, Capan-2, MiapaCa-2, and Panc-1. For this purpose, we first evaluated the gene and protein expression of FOLR1 on four ADKP cell lines. Subsequently, we evaluated PS2's efficacy in our cell lines and we assessed the impact of PDT on the secretome of cancer cells and its impact on the immune system. Finally, we evaluate the PDT efficacy on a humanized SCID mouse model of pancreatic cancer. In a very interesting way, we observed a significant increase in the proliferation of activated-human PBMC when cultured with conditioned media of ADKP cancer cells subjected to PDT. Furthermore, to evaluate in vivo the impact of this new PS, we analyzed the tumor growth in a humanized SCID mice model of pancreatic cancer. Four conditions were tested: Untreated, mice (nontreated), mice with PS (PS2), mice subjected to illumination (Light only), and mice subjected to illumination in the presence of PS (PDT). We noticed that the mice subjected to PDT presented a strong decrease in the growth of the tumor over time after illumination. Our investigations have not only suggested that PS2-PDT is an effective therapy in the treatment of PDAC but also that it activates the immune system and could be considered as a real adjuvant for anti-cancer vaccination. Thus, this new study provides new treatment options for patients in a therapeutic impasse and will provide a new arsenal in the fight against PDAC.

Keywords: folate-coupled photosensitizer; immuno-adjuvant; pancreatic cancer; photodynamic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transcriptomic and protein expression of folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines and one ovarian cancer (positive control). (A) Expression of FOLR1 by RT-qPCR. (B) Membrane protein expression of FOLR1 by flow cytometry (RFI).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Localization of photosensitizer (PS)-2 in four PDAC cell lines. Cells are cultured with 1 µg/mL of PS2 during 24 h. Images are obtained using confocal microcopy 63× magnification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Localization of photosensitizer (PS)-2 in four PDAC cell lines. Cells are cultured with 1 µg/mL of PS2 during 24 h. Images are obtained using confocal microcopy 63× magnification.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Impact of PS2-PhotoDynamic Therapy (PDT) on the four PDAC cell lines and one ovarian cancer viability. (A) Before illumination, (B) 10 min after illumination, (C) 4 h after illumination, and (D) 24 h after illumination. All quoted p-values are two-sided, with p ≤ 0.00001 (****) being considered statistically significant for the first and highly significant for the others.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Determination of the concentration of the Lethal Dose (LD)-50. The cells were incubated at the indicated PS2 concentrations for 24 h. The viability test was carried out 24 h after PDT. The viability percentage was calculated by making a ratio of the different conditions to the untreated cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5
ELISA of different cytokines in the medium culture of the four cancer cell lines (A) Interleukine (IL)-2, (B) IL-10, (C) Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α, (D) Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β, (E) Interferon (IFN)-γ, and (F) IL-6 detection by ELISA. Dotted line represent the limit of quantification threshold. All quoted p-values are two-sided, with p ≤ 0.00001 (****) being considered statistically significant for the first and highly significant for the others.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) proliferation tests in the presence of conditioned media from the MiaPaCa-2 lineage. The PBMCs were activated with an anti-CD3–CD28 cocktail and incubated in the presence of the conditioned media (CM) for 48, 72, 96, and 120 h. All quoted p-values are two-sided, with p ≤ 0.05 (*), p ≤ 0.001 (**), p ≤ 0.0001 (***), and p ≤ 0.00001 (****) being considered statistically significant for the first and highly significant for the others.
Figure 7
Figure 7
In vivo evaluation of PDT efficacy in a humanized Severe Combined ImmunoDeficiency (SCID) mice model of pancreatic cancer in one set of experiment (A) and for a second set of experiment (B). n = 3 per condition per experiment.

References

    1. Adamska A., Domenichini A., Falasca M. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Current and evolving therapies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1338. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071338. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiaravalli M., Reni M., O’Reilly E.M. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: State-of-the-art 2017 and new therapeutic strategies. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2017;60:32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.08.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ducreux M., Caramella C., Hollebecque A., Burtin P., Goéré D., Seufferlein T., Haustermans K., Van Laethem J.L., Conroy T., Arnold D. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2015;26:v56–v68. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv295. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahib L., Smith B.D., Aizenberg R., Rosenzweig A.B., Fleshman J.M., Matrisian L.M. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the united states. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–2921. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buscail L., Bournet B. Adénocarcinome du pancréas: Quels traitements proposer en 2017 et quelles sont les thérapeutiques d’avenir? La lettre de l’hépato-gastroentérologue. 2017;2:84–88.

LinkOut - more resources