Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 14;10(1):260.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57155-7.

Glycofullerenes as non-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors- towards better nanotherapeutics for pancreatic cancer treatment

Affiliations

Glycofullerenes as non-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors- towards better nanotherapeutics for pancreatic cancer treatment

Maciej Serda et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The water-soluble glycofullerenes GF1 and GF2 were synthesized using two-step modified Bingel-Hirsch methodology. Interestingly, we identified buckyballs as a novel class of non-receptor Src kinases inhibitors. The evaluated compounds were found to inhibit Fyn A and BTK proteins with IC50 values in the low micromolar range, with the most active compound at 39 µM. Moreover, we have demonstrated that formation of protein corona on the surface of [60]fullerene derivatives is changing the landscape of their activity, tuning the selectivity of obtained carbon nanomaterials towards Fyn A and BTK kinases. The performed molecular biology studies revealed no cytotoxicity and no influence of engineered carbon nanomaterials on the cell cycle of PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cancer cell lines. Incubation with the tested compounds resulted in the cellular redox imbalance triggering the repair systems and influenced the changing of protein levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Structures of GF1 and GF2 glycofullerenes; (B) Inhibitory activity of glycofullerenes on a panel of non-receptor tyrosine kinases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
qRT-PCR analysis of expression of FYN and LCK in PANC-1 (A) and AsPC-1 cells (B) after 24-hour and 72-hour incubation with glycofullerenes (1 mg/mL). The results are shown as the mean ± SD of four independent measurements, each in triplicate. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the control and respective compounds.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effect of glycofullerenes (1 mg/mL) on the expression of Fyn, Lck, p21, p53, and HO-1 in PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cells (A). Densitometric analyses of these proteins were normalized to GAPDH, vinculin, or β-actin. The results are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni’s post-hoc test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the control group and respective compounds (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Influence of glycofullerenes on the cell cycle progression in pancreatic cell lines. The representative histograms from flow cytometry show cell cycle distribution after 24-hour incubation with glycofullerenes (0.1 and 1 mg/mL) in PANC-1 (A) and AsPC-1 (B) cells. The graph shows the mean ± SD percentage of cells in the G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases of the cell cycle from three independent experiments.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Influence of glycofullerenes (1 mg/mL) on autophagy induction in PANC-1 (A) and AsPC-1 (B) cells. The histograms show the autophagy induction ratio that was calculated by comparison of fluorescence from control cells (blue or gray peak) to the tested compounds (red peak). As a positive control, Imatinib (25 μM) was used. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the control (untreated cells).

References

    1. Kamisawa T, Wood LD, Itoi T, Takaori K. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2016;388:73–85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00141-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer zum Büschenfelde C, Friess H, Kleeff J. Preoperative/Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Response and Resection Percentages. PLOS Med. 2010;7:e1000267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000267. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiorean EG, Coveler AL. Pancreatic cancer: optimizing treatment options, new, and emerging targeted therapies. Drug. Des. Devel Ther. 2015;9:3529–3545. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S60328. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kang S.-g., Zhou G., Yang P., Liu Y., Sun B., Huynh T., Meng H., Zhao L., Xing G., Chen C., Zhao Y., Zhou R. Molecular mechanism of pancreatic tumor metastasis inhibition by Gd@C82(OH)22 and its implication for de novo design of nanomedicine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(38):15431–15436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204600109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao R, et al. Photothermal Effect Enhanced Cascade-Targeting Strategy for Improved Pancreatic Cancer Therapy by Gold Nanoshell@Mesoporous Silica Nanorod. ACS Nano. 2017;11:8103–8113. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b02918. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms