A comparison of energy expenditure during rowing and cycling ergometry
- PMID: 3193864
A comparison of energy expenditure during rowing and cycling ergometry
Abstract
Metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses of healthy adults were compared at similar incremental power outputs during a variable-resistance rowing exercise and a fixed-resistance cycle ergometer exercise. Repeated measurements of power (watts), VEBTPS, VO2 STPD, and HR were obtained on 60 men and 47 women ranging in age from 20 to 74 yr. Average maximal power output for the men was significantly higher (P less than 0.05) for cycling than rowing: 207 +/- 5.2 W vs 195 +/- 58 W (mean +/- SE). A similar difference was also observed for women favoring cycling: 135 +/- 4.1 W vs 126 +/- 4.9 W (mean +/- SE). VEBTPS, VO2 STPD, and HR were significantly higher at all power increments during the rowing graded exercise test (RGXT) when compared with the same exercise intensity during the cycle graded exercise test (CGXT). Consistent linearity was found between VEBTPS and VO2 STPD and between HR and VO2 STPD for both exercises. The linear relationship between VEBTPS and VO2 STPD for men during RGXT was r = 0.976, P less than 0.001, slope = 44.6 +/- 1.03, and for women during RGXT it was r = 0.990, P less than 0.001, slope = 19.6 +/- 0.36. The relationship between HR and VO2 STPD for men during rowing was r = 0.989, P less than 0.001, slope = 29.1 +/- 0.76, and for women during rowing it was r = 0.971, P less than 0.001, slope = 35.7 +/- 0.89. The linear relationship between VEBTPS and VO2 STPD for men during CGXT was r = 0.991, P less than 0.001, slope = 31.1 +/- 0.98, and for women it was r = 0.959, P less than 0.991, slope = 29.6 +/- 0.87. The relationship between HR and VO2 STPD for men during CGXT was r = 0.997, P less than 0.001, slope = 28.1 +/- 0.83, and for women it was r = 0.990, R less than 0.001, slope = 35.9 +/- 0.96. Results indicated that energy costs for rowing ergometry was significantly higher than cycle ergometry at all comparative power outputs including maximum levels. It was concluded that rowing ergometry could be an effective alternative activity for physical fitness and exercise rehabilitation programs.
Similar articles
-
Cardiovascular responses to rowing.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987 Jun;19(3):239-45. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987. PMID: 3600237
-
Short-arm (1.9 m) +2.2 Gz acceleration: isotonic exercise load-O2 uptake relationship.Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Dec;70(12):1173-82. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999. PMID: 10596770
-
Circulatory and metabolic responses of women to arm crank and wheelchair ergometry.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Feb;71(2):97-100. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990. PMID: 2302053 Clinical Trial.
-
Applied physiology of rowing.Sports Med. 1984 Jul-Aug;1(4):303-26. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198401040-00005. Sports Med. 1984. PMID: 6390606 Review.
-
Energy cost calculations for exercise prescription: an update.Sports Med. 2000 Jul;30(1):17-22. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00002. Sports Med. 2000. PMID: 10907754 Review.
Cited by
-
Physiological and biomechanical aspects of rowing. Implications for training.Sports Med. 1993 Jan;15(1):24-42. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199315010-00004. Sports Med. 1993. PMID: 8426942 Review.
-
An Updated Narrative Review on Ergometric Systems Applied to Date in Assessing Divers' Fitness.Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 13;9(8):1044. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081044. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34442180 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of the Polar S810i(TM) Heart Rate Monitor and the Sensewear Pro Armband(TM) to Estimate Energy Expenditure of Indoor Rowing Exercise in Overweight and Obese Individuals.J Sports Sci Med. 2010 Sep 1;9(3):508-16. eCollection 2010. J Sports Sci Med. 2010. PMID: 24149647 Free PMC article.
-
The assessment of energy demand in the new Olympic windsurf board: Neilpryde RS:X.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 May;100(2):247-52. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0403-1. Epub 2007 Feb 13. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007. PMID: 17297627 Clinical Trial.
-
A new approach to rowing ergometry: establishing exercise intensity relative to maximum force output.Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;62(1):44-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00635633. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991. PMID: 2007396
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical