Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 12;11(12):e6366.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.6366.

Reattachment of the Multifidus Tendon in Lumbar Surgery to Decrease Postoperative Back Pain: A Technical Note

Neil Klinger  1 , Emre Yilmaz  2 , Dia R Halalmeh  3 , R Shane Tubbs  4 , Marc D Moisi  3
Affiliations

Reattachment of the Multifidus Tendon in Lumbar Surgery to Decrease Postoperative Back Pain: A Technical Note

Neil Klinger et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

The posterior midline approach to the lumbar spine requires significant manipulation of the paraspinal muscles. Muscle detachment and retraction results in iatrogenic damage such as crush injury, devascularization, and denervation, all of which have been associated with postoperative pain. The muscle most directly affected by the posterior approach is the lumbar multifidus (LM), the largest and most medial of the deep lumbar paraspinal muscles. The effects of the posterior approach on the integrity of the LM is concerning, as multiple studies have demonstrated that intraoperative injuries sustained by the LM lead to postoperative muscle atrophy and potentially worsening low back pain. Given the inevitability of intraoperative paraspinal muscle manipulation when using the posterior approach, this technical note describes methods by which surgeons may minimize LM tissue disruption and restore the anatomical position of the LM to ultimately expedite recovery, minimize postoperative pain, and improve patient satisfaction.

Keywords: back pain; lumbar surgery; multifidus muscle; postoperative; reattachment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multifidus muscle identification and detachment
(A) Cadaveric dissection using wide retraction to display the LM in natural anatomical position, with the LM inserting rostrally into the spinous processes of the lumbar vertebrae in a fanning pattern (small white arrows). (B) Tendon insertion of the LM sharply divided with a residual cuff on the spinous process. LM, lumbar multifidus
Figure 2
Figure 2. Multifidus muscle reattachment
Cadaveric dissection using wide retraction to display reattachment of the LM to the tendon insertion at the spinous process. (A) Suture needle through the residual tendon cuff of the LM attached to the spinous process. (B) Residual tendon cuff of the LM is re-approximated to the body of the LM. (C) Suture placed to reattach the tendon insertion of the LM to the body of the LM. LM, lumbar multifidus
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach. Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, Zhao X, Huang Y, Fang X. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:316–324. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. Spine. 2002;27:1131–1141. - PubMed
    1. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Tsuji H. Spine. 1999;24:1023–1028. - PubMed
    1. Risk factors of postoperative low back pain for low grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: an at least 2-year follow-up retrospective study. Guan F, Bao R, Zhu L, Guan G, Chi Z, Gu J, Yu Z. World Neurosurg. 2017;107:789–794. - PubMed
    1. Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle volume: comparison between paramedian interfascial and midline approaches for lumbar fusion. Hyun SJ, Kim YB, Kim YS, Park SW, Nam TK, Hong HJ, Kwon JT. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22:646–651. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources