Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial
- PMID: 31939369
- DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_37_18
Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial
Abstract
Introduction: Cleaning and shaping plays a very important role in success of root canal procedures. There are various instrumentation techniques available for root canal preparation. Recently, an exclusive rotary file for root canal preparation of primary teeth has been introduced.
Aim of the study: The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the quality of obturation and intensity, and duration of post-operative pain between two rotary file systems with manual files during the pulpectomy of primary molars.
Materials and methods: Forty five primary mandibular molars were included in this study, which was randomly allocated into one of the three experimental groups (n = 15). Group A: Instrumentation was done using Hand K-file; Group B: Instrumentation was done using Kedo-S rotary file system; and Group C: Instrumentation was done using K3 rotary file system. The quality of obturation was recorded as optimal, underfilled, or overfilled using standardized intraoral periapical radiographs. This study also evaluated the intensity and duration of postoperative pain at different time intervals: 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours following the pulpectomy.
Results: With respect to quality of obturation, less underfilling was noticed in Kedo-S rotary files (16.7%) followed by using K3 rotary files (33.3%) and hand K files (43.3%). Kedo-S file showed the least underfilled canals (16.7%) and comparatively more overfilled canals (26.6%) and it was statistically significant (P value of 0.001 and 0.002 respectively). On comparing the intensity and duration of postoperative pain among the three groups, there was no statistically significant difference between these groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Kedo-S pediatric rotary file system shows considerably better quality of obturation when compared to that of K3 rotary and hand K file systems without much of any significant difference in relevance to the post-operative pain.
Keywords: Hand files; pediatric rotary files; pulpectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Similar articles
-
Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Dec;21(6):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00518-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020. PMID: 32185634 Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of clinical and radiographic efficiency of manual and pediatric rotary file systems in primary root canal preparation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 23;23(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03393-1. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 37742023 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Aug;19(4):273-278. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0356-6. Epub 2018 Jul 12. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018. PMID: 30003514
-
Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Reciprocating and Rotary Files in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Dec 1;25(12):1179-1189. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3799. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024. PMID: 40079998
-
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of the Pro AF Baby Gold and Kedo-S pediatric endodontic files for canal instrumentation, transportation, and centering ratio - A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2024 Apr 1;42(2):73-82. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_526_23. Epub 2024 Jun 28. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2024. PMID: 38957903
Cited by
-
Volumetric Analysis of Various Pediatric Rotary Files in the Preparation of Primary Root Canals Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jan;17(1):15-20. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2724. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024. PMID: 38559863 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Instrumentation Time, Obturation Time, and Radiographic Quality of Obturation Using Two Rotary Systems and Manual Technique for Primary Molar Pulpectomies - In vivo Study.Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):55-62. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_83_20. Epub 2021 Mar 20. Contemp Clin Dent. 2021. PMID: 33967539 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Single Rotary File System and Sequential Multi-file Rotary Systems on Time for Biomechanical Preparation and Obturation Quality in Single-visit Pulpectomy Protocol: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov;16(Suppl 3):247-252. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2685. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023. PMID: 38268640 Free PMC article.
-
Different outcomes of rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth pulpectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Jun;26(3):423-450. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01020-x. Epub 2025 Mar 24. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025. PMID: 40128471
-
Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Preparation With Different Instruments in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70180. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70180. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025. PMID: 40702914 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials