Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec 20;33(1):1-17.
doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2018-0288.

Objective measures of workload in healthcare: a narrative review

Daniela Fishbein  1 , Siddhartha Nambiar  2 , Kendall McKenzie  2 , Maria Mayorga  2 , Kristen Miller  3 , Kevin Tran  4 , Laura Schubel  3 , Joseph Agor  5 , Tracy Kim  3 , Muge Capan  4
Affiliations
Review

Objective measures of workload in healthcare: a narrative review

Daniela Fishbein et al. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. .

Abstract

Purpose: Workload is a critical concept in the evaluation of performance and quality in healthcare systems, but its definition relies on the perspective (e.g. individual clinician-level vs unit-level workload) and type of available metrics (e.g. objective vs subjective measures). The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of objective measures of workload associated with direct care delivery in tertiary healthcare settings, with a focus on measures that can be obtained from electronic records to inform operationalization of workload measurement.

Design/methodology/approach: Relevant papers published between January 2008 and July 2018 were identified through a search in Pubmed and Compendex databases using the Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research Type framework. Identified measures were classified into four levels of workload: task, patient, clinician and unit.

Findings: Of 30 papers reviewed, 9 used task-level metrics, 14 used patient-level metrics, 7 used clinician-level metrics and 20 used unit-level metrics. Key objective measures of workload include: patient turnover (n=9), volume of patients (n=6), acuity (n=6), nurse-to-patient ratios (n=5) and direct care time (n=5). Several methods for operationalization of these metrics into measurement tools were identified.

Originality/value: This review highlights the key objective workload measures available in electronic records that can be utilized to develop an operational approach for quantifying workload. Insights gained from this review can inform the design of processes to track workload and mitigate the effects of increased workload on patient outcomes and clinician performance.

Keywords: Care delivery needs of patients; Clinician performance; Objective workload; Task demand; Workload.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abbass, I., Helton, J., Mhatre, S. and Sansgiry, S.S. (2012), “Impact of electronic health records on nurses’ productivity”, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 237-241.
    1. Adams, T., O’Sullivan, M. and Walker, C. (2019), “Physician rostering for workload Balance”, Operations Research for Health Care, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 1-10.
    1. Agor, J., McKenzie, K., Mayorga, M.E., Ozaltin, O., Parikh, R.S. and Huddleston, J. (2017), “Simulating triage of patients into an internal medicine department to validate the use of an optimization-based workload score”, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Press, Washington, DC, pp. 3708-3709.
    1. Aiken, L., Clarke, S., Sloane, D., Sochalski, J. and Silber, J. (2002), “Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction”, JAMA, Vol. 288 No. 16, pp. 1987-1993.
    1. Alghamdi, M.G. (2016), “Nursing workload: a concept analysis”, Journal of Nursing Management, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 449-457.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources