Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):362.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57202-3.

A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System

Affiliations

A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System

Xiaoliang Liu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This retrospective study was designed to investigate the heterogeneity of patients with cervical cancer in stage IIIC1 (the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system, FIGO) and conduct a risk stratification for this group of patients. We reviewed clinical records of 325 patients with stage IIIC1 treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in our institute between January 2008 and December 2014. The median follow-up duration was 28.4 months (range: 1.9-114.2 months). The 3-year DFS for the 325 eligible patients was 66.3%. Tumor size of ≥4 cm and number of pelvic lymph node metastasis ≥2 were identified as adverse prognostic factors for disease free survival (DFS) in cervical cancer patients with stage IIIC1 (2018). A risk stratification based on the number of identified prognostic factors for DFS was performed. The 3-year DFS for patients in low-risk (without prognostic factor), intermediate-risk (with one prognostic factor) and high-risk group (with two prognostic factors) was 92.1%, 70.0%, and 51.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Our study confirms the heterogeneity of patients with cervical cancer in FIGO stage IIIC1 (the 2018 FIGO staging system). Tumor size and number of pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) are significant prognostic factors for DFS in patients with FIGO stage IIIC1. The next revision of FIGO staging system for cervical cancer, especially for stage IIIC1, should focus on tumor size and number of pelvic lymph node metastasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disease free survival (DFS) for patients with cervical cancer in stage IIIC1 (FIGO 2018). 3-y DFS: 66.3%.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Disease free survival (DFS) for patients with cervical cancer in stage IIIC1 (FIGO 2018) regarding rumor size. 3y-DFS: ≥4 cm vs <4 cm = 57.6% vs 84.5% (HR = 2.00, 95%CI = 1.13–3.57, P = 0.018).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Disease free survival (DFS) for patients with stage IIIC1 (FIGO 2018) regarding number of pelvic lymph node metastasis. 3y-DFS: ≥2 vs <2 = 55.8% vs 79.6% (HR = 2.10, 95%CI = 1.04–4.24, P = 0.039).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Disease free survival (DFS) for patients with stage IIIC1 (FIGO 2018) regarding risk groups. 3y-DFS: low-risk vs intermediate-risk vs high-risk = 51.1% vs 70.0% vs 92.1% (P < 0.001).

References

    1. Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, Ferlay J. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. Int. J. Cancer. 2013;132:1133–1145. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27711. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen W, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016;66:115–132. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int. J. Gynecol. & Obstet. 2009;105:103–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oncology FCoG. FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2014;125:97–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Narayan K, Fisher RJ, Bernshaw D, Shakher R, Hicks RJ. Patterns of failure and prognostic factor analyses in locally advanced cervical cancer patients staged by positron emission tomography and treated with curative intent. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2009;19:912–918. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a58d3f. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types