Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep 30;7(9):e2408.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002408. eCollection 2019 Sep.

Levels of Evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Research: Have We Improved Over the Past 10 Years?

Conor M Sugrue  1 , Cormac W Joyce  1 , Sean M Carroll  1
Affiliations
Review

Levels of Evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Research: Have We Improved Over the Past 10 Years?

Conor M Sugrue et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Levels of evidence (LOE) aid in the critical appraisal of evidence by ranking studies based on limitation of its design. Analyzing LOE provides insight into application of evidence-based medicine. The aim of this study is to determine if the quality of evidence in plastic surgery research has improved over the past 10 years. Systematic review of research published in Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery journal over the years, 10-year period (2008, 2013, 2018), was performed. LOE for each article was determined using the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) guidelines. Each level was calculated as percentage of publications per year and compared yearly and between different topics. Eight hundred eighty-four studies were included in the final analysis. The LOE of the research improved over the study period. Level 4 evidence was the most frequent published (50.6%, 447/884), with a decline from 63.2% in 2008 to 41.3% in 2018. Level 1 evidence improved each year and accounted for 2.1% of all research in 2018. Aesthetic surgery was the most frequent published topic with upper limb research demonstrating an 18.5% increase in high-quality evidence over the study period. Increased awareness of evidence-based medicine has improved the quality of plastic surgery research over the past decade. It is vital this continues to provide gold standard patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flow diagram of study methodology. CME indicates continuing medical education; LOE, levels of evidence.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Grunwald T, Krummel T, Sherman R. Advanced technologies in plastic surgery: how new innovations can improve our training and practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1556–1567. - PubMed
    1. Hernandez-Boussard T, McDonald KM, Rhoads KF, et al. Patient safety in plastic surgery: identifying areas for quality improvement efforts. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74:597–602. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans D. Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12:77–84. - PubMed
    1. Poolman RW, Kerkhoffs GM, Struijs PA, et al. Don’t be misled by the orthopedic literature: tips for critical appraisal. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:162–171. - PubMed