Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;115(7):1382-1394.
doi: 10.1111/add.14938. Epub 2020 Jan 14.

Development of a computerized adaptive substance use disorder scale for screening and measurement: the CAT-SUD

Affiliations

Development of a computerized adaptive substance use disorder scale for screening and measurement: the CAT-SUD

Robert D Gibbons et al. Addiction. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aims: The focus of this paper is on the improvement of substance use disorder (SUD) screening and measurement. Using a multi-dimensional item response theory model, the bifactor model, we provide a psychometric harmonization between SUD, depression, anxiety, trauma, social isolation, functional impairment and risk-taking behavior symptom domains, providing a more balanced view of SUD. The aims are to (1) develop the item-bank, (2) calibrate the item-bank using a bifactor model that includes a primary dimension and symptom-specific subdomains, (3) administer using computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and (4) validate the CAT-SUD in Spanish and English in the United States and Spain.

Design: Item bank construction, item calibration phase, CAT-SUD validation phase.

Setting: Primary care, community clinics, emergency departments and patient-to-patient referrals in Spain (Barcelona and Madrid) and the United States (Boston and Los Angeles).

Participants/cases: Calibration phase: the CAT-SUD was developed via simulation from complete item responses in 513 participants. Validation phase: 297 participants received the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the CAT-SUD.

Measurements: A total of 252 items from five subdomains: (1) SUD, (2) psychological disorders, (3) risky behavior, (4) functional impairment and (5) social support. CAT-SUD scale scores and CIDI SUD diagnosis.

Findings: Calibration: the bifactor model provided excellent fit to the multi-dimensional item bank; 168 items had high loadings (> 0.4 with the majority > 0.6) on the primary SUD dimension. Using an average of 11 items (four to 26), which represents a 94% reduction in respondent burden (average administration time of approximately 2 minutes), we found a correlation of 0.91 with the 168-item scale (precision of 5 points on a 100-point scale).

Validation: strong agreement was found between the primary CAT-SUD dimension estimate and the results of a structured clinical interview. There was a 20-fold increase in the likelihood of a CIDI SUD diagnosis across the range of the CAT-SUD (AUC = 0.85).

Conclusions: We have developed a new approach for the screening and measurement of SUD and related severity based on multi-dimensional item response theory. The bifactor model harmonized information from mental health, trauma, social support and traditional SUD items to provide a more complete characterization of SUD. The CAT-SUD is highly predictive of a current SUD diagnosis based on a structured clinical interview, and may be predictive of the development of SUD in the future.

Keywords: Computerized adaptive testing; Latino; bifactor model; item response theory; mental health; substance use disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflicts of Interest:

Dr. Gibbons has been an expert witness for the U.S. Department of Justice, Merck, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, and Wyeth and is a founder of Adaptive Testing Technologies, which distributes the CAT-MH™ battery of adaptive tests. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of Chicago in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Consort Diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted Probabilities of CIDI SUD Diagnosis with 95% Confidence Intervals
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
ROC Curve

References

    1. Haffajee RL, Frank RG Making the Opioid Public Health Emergency Effective. JAMA Psychiatry 2018; 75: 767–768. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Creedon TB, Lê Cook B Access to Mental Health Care Increased But Not For Substance Use, While Disparities Remain. Health Affairs, 2016; 35: 1017–1021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Priester MA, Browne T, Iachini A, Clone S, DeHart D, Seay KD Treatment Access Barriers and Disparities Among Individuals with Co-Occurring Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders: An Integrative Literature Review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2015; 61: 47–59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); Office of the Surgeon General (US). Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health [Internet]. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2016 Nov. CHAPTER 4, EARLY INTERVENTION, TREATMENT, AND MANAGEMENT OF SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK424859/ - PubMed
    1. Lê Cook B, Alegría M Racial-ethnic disparities in substance abuse treatment: the role of criminal history and socioeconomic status. Psychiatric Services 2011; 62: 1273–1281. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types