Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug-Sep;69(6):668-674.
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1705839. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

A mixed-methods evaluation of college student and provider perspectives on a smartphone application for help-seeking after violence

Affiliations

A mixed-methods evaluation of college student and provider perspectives on a smartphone application for help-seeking after violence

Jocelyn C Anderson et al. J Am Coll Health. 2021 Aug-Sep.

Abstract

To elicit feedback on the acceptability, usability, and dissemination options for the bMOREsafe smartphone application (app). Participants: Forty-nine students and six service-providers provided feedback on the bMOREsafe app between April 2015 and March 2016. Methods: Students responded to an anonymous online survey and providers participated in semi-structured interviews. Descriptive and thematic analyses were completed. Results: Students rated the app as useful, however less applicable to themselves and their peers. Students stated they would be most receptive to recommendations about the app from peers and social media. Qualitative data from service providers fell into three main categories: trauma-informed aspects; inclusivity vs. specificity; and within an app, language matters. Conclusions: Smartphone technology can provide confidential information and resources to help students make decisions related to sexual assault or intimate partner violence care. While students and providers identified apps as a useful strategy for sharing this information, dissemination challenges remain.

Keywords: Help-seeking; mixed-methods; sexual violence; smartphone applications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Student reported dissemination results.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Provider reported dissemination strategies from interviews. *n=26 unique strategies coded during analysis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cantor D, Fisher B, Chibnall S, et al.Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct. Bethesda, MD; 2015.
    1. Krebs C, Lindquist C, Berzofsky M, Shook-Sa B, Peterson K, Planty M, Langton L SJ. Campus climate survey validation study. Bur Justice Stat Res Dev Ser. 2016;Bureau of(2011).
    1. Muehlenhard CL, Peterson ZD, Humphreys TP, Jozkowski KN. Evaluating the One-in-Five Statistic: Women’s Risk of Sexual Assault While in College. J Sex Res. 2017;54(4–5):549–576. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carey KB, Durney SE, Shepardson RL, Carey MP. Incapacitated and Forcible Rape of College Women: Prevalence Across the First Year. J Adolesc Heal. 2015;56(6):678–680. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krebs CP, Lindquist CH, Warner TD, Fisher BS, Martin SL. The Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study. Washington, DC; 2007.

Publication types