Under-detection of blood culture-positive enteric fever cases: The impact of missing data and methods for adjusting incidence estimates
- PMID: 31945052
- PMCID: PMC6964825
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007805
Under-detection of blood culture-positive enteric fever cases: The impact of missing data and methods for adjusting incidence estimates
Abstract
Background: In surveillance for typhoid fever, under-detection of cases occurs when patients with fever do not seek medical care, or seek medical care but do not receive a blood test. Missing data may result in incorrect estimates of disease incidence.
Methods: We used data from an ongoing randomised clinical trial of typhoid conjugate vaccine among children in Nepal to determine if eligible patients attending our fever clinics who did not have blood taken for culture had a lower risk of disease than those who had blood drawn. We assessed clinical and demographic predictors of having blood taken for culture, and predictors of culture-positive results. Missing blood culture data were imputed using multiple imputations.
Results: During the first year of surveillance, 2392 fever presentations were recorded and 1615 (68%) of these had blood cultures. Children were more likely to have blood taken for culture if they were older, had fever for longer, a current temperature ≥38 degrees, or if typhoid or a urinary tract infection were suspected. Based on imputation models, those with blood cultures were 1.87 times more likely to have blood culture-positive fever than those with missing data.
Conclusion: Clinical opinion on the cause of the fever may play a large part in the decision to offer blood culture, regardless of study protocol. Crude typhoid incidence estimates should be adjusted for the proportion of cases that go undetected due to missing blood cultures while adjusting for the lower likelihood of culture-positivity in the group with missing data.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following potential competing interests: AJP is Chair of UK Dept. Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation (JCVI) & the European Medicine Agency (EMA) scientific advisory group on vaccines, and is a member of the WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts. VEP is a member of the WHO Immunization and Vaccine-related Implementation Research Advisory Committee. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of DHSC, JCVI or WHO. MV is funded by a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Research Fellowship (DRF-2015-08-048). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Figures
References
-
- Antillon M, Saad NJ, Baker S, Pollard AJ, Pitzer VE. The Relationship Between Blood Sample Volume and Diagnostic Sensitivity of Blood Culture for Typhoid and Paratyphoid Fever: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(suppl_4):S255–S67. 10.1093/infdis/jiy471 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Andrews JR, Barkume C, Yu AT, Saha SK, Qamar FN, Garrett D, et al. Integrating Facility-Based Surveillance With Healthcare Utilization Surveys to Estimate Enteric Fever Incidence: Methods and Challenges. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(suppl_4):S268–S76. Epub 2018/09/06. 10.1093/infdis/jiy494 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
