Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 4;17(1):353.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010353.

Descriptive Epidemiology of Safety Events at an Academic Medical Center

Affiliations

Descriptive Epidemiology of Safety Events at an Academic Medical Center

Alexandre R Marra et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Adverse safety events in healthcare are of great concern, and despite an increasing focus on the prevention of error and harm mitigation, the epidemiology of safety events remains incomplete. Methods: We performed an analysis of all reported safety events in an academic medical center using a voluntary incident reporting surveillance system for patient safety. Safety events were classified as: serious (reached the patient and resulted in moderate to severe harm or death); precursor (reached the patient and resulted in minimal or no detectable harm); and near miss (did not reach the patient). Results: During a three-year period, there were 31,817 events reported. Most of the safety events were precursor safety events (reached the patient and resulted in minimal harm or no detectable harm), corresponding to 77.3%. Near misses accounted for 10.8%, and unsafe conditions for 11.8%. The number of reported serious safety events was low, accounting for only 0.1% of all safety events. Conclusions: The reports analysis of these events should lead to a better understanding of risks in patient care and ways to mitigate it.

Keywords: epidemiology; patient safety; safety events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Taylor N., Clay-Williams R., Hogden E., Pye V., Li Z., Groene O., Sunol R., Braithwaite J. Deepening our Understanding of Quality in Australia (DUQuA): A study protocol for a nationwide, multilevel analysis of relationships between hospital quality management systems and patient factors. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e010349. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010349. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh H., Sittig D.F. Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2016;25:226–232. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004486. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boaz A., Hanney S., Jones T., Soper B. Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: A three-stage review. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e009415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banerjee A.K., Okun S., Edwards I.R., Wicks P., Smith M.Y., Mayall S.J., Flamion B., Cleeland C., Basch E. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Safety Event Reporting: PROSPER Consortium guidance. Drug Saf. 2013;36:1129–1149. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0113-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramachandran S.K., Kheterpal S. Outcomes research using quality improvement databases: Evolving opportunities and challenges. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2011;29:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2010.11.005. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms