Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;40(2):119-143.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X19896348. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review

Affiliations

Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review

Johanna Glaser et al. Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background. Patient comprehension is fundamental to valid informed consent. Current practices often result in inadequate patient comprehension. Purpose. An updated review to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of interventions to improve patient comprehension in clinical informed consent. Data Sources. Systematic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE (2008-2018). Study Selection. We included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials evaluating interventions to improve patient comprehension in clinical informed consent. Data Extraction. Reviewers independently abstracted data using a standardized form, comparing all results and resolving disagreements by consensus. Data Synthesis. Fifty-two studies of 60 interventions met inclusion criteria. Compared with standard informed consent, a statistically significant improvement in patient comprehension was seen with 43% (6/14) of written interventions, 56% (15/27) of audiovisual interventions, 67% (2/3) of multicomponent interventions, 85% (11/13) of interactive digital interventions, and 100% (3/3) of verbal discussion with test/feedback or teach-back interventions. Eighty-five percent of studies (44/52) evaluated patients' understanding of risks, 69% (41/52) general knowledge about the procedure, 35% (18/52) understanding of benefits, and 31% (16/52) understanding of alternatives. Participants' education level was reported heterogeneously, and only 8% (4/52) of studies examined effects according to health literacy. Most studies (79%, 41/52) did not specify participants' race/ethnicity. Limitations. Variation in interventions and outcome measures precluded conduct of a meta-analysis or calculation of mean effect size. Control group processes were variable and inconsistently characterized. Nearly half of studies (44%, 23/52) had a high risk of bias for the patient comprehension outcome. Conclusions. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent are heterogeneous. Interactive interventions, particularly with test/feedback or teach-back components, appear superior. Future research should emphasize all key elements of informed consent and explore effects among vulnerable populations.

Keywords: comprehension; informed consent; interpersonal communication; intervention; understanding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Results of literature searches to identify studies of interventions to improve patient comprehension in clinical informed consent
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Number of Interventions that Improved or Did Not Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent by Intervention Type
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Percent of Interventions that Improved Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent by Degree of Interactivity

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Medical Association. Informed Consent, http://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/informed-consent. (Accessed Sep 8, 2019).
    1. Department of Health. Reference guide to consent for examination or treatment, second edition. London: Department of Health (UK) July 2009.
    1. <b/>The Joint Commission, Division of Health Care Improvement Informed consent: more than getting a signature. Quick Safety, Issue 21 February 2016.
    1. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ, eds. Preferences of Patients. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.
    1. Brezis M, Israel S, Weinstein-Birenshtock A, et al. Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 2008. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn025. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types