Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jan 16;20(1):19.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1933-z.

Evidence-based medicine self-assessment, knowledge, and integration into daily practice: a survey among Romanian physicians and comparison between trainees and specialists

Roxana-Denisa Capraş  1   2 , Adriana Elena Bulboacă  3 , Sorana D Bolboacă  4
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evidence-based medicine self-assessment, knowledge, and integration into daily practice: a survey among Romanian physicians and comparison between trainees and specialists

Roxana-Denisa Capraş et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: A gap between the attitude towards evidence-based medicine (EBM), knowledge and awareness has been reported among physicians from different parts of the world. However, no investigation on Romanian physicians is available in the scientific literature. Our study aimed, firstly, to assess EBM awareness and the knowledge used by Romanian physicians, and, secondly, to compare resident trainees with specialists.

Methods: Romanian trainee and specialist physicians were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. The study tool was an online questionnaire designed to explore their awareness, knowledge, usefulness, the attitude in medical documentation, and the use of professional EBM resources. Data were collected by Google Form from January 1st to April 30th, 2017, respecting the responders' anonymity. Two groups of physicians were investigated as trainees and specialists, respectively. Descriptive statistics (number, percentage, median and interquartile range) was used to describe the survey-related variables. Statistical significance on qualitative data was calculated with the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or the Z-test for proportions.

Results: Two hundred and 50 physicians participated in this study (68% trainees vs. 32% specialists). In both groups, a significantly high percentage was represented by women as compared to men (trainees 72.4%, specialists 70%). The correct definition of EBM was identified by most respondents (75.6%). Affirmatively, both trainees and specialists always looked at levels of evidence when reading scientific literature, but a small percentage (6.5% trainees and 3% specialists) adequately identified the uppermost types of evidence in the hierarchy. Almost a quarter of the respondents shared the name of mobile EBM resources that they used to support the daily practice. Only six out of the 49 listed mobile resources met the EBM criteria.

Conclusions: The participants proved to have limited knowledge of EBM and a positive attitude towards the concept. They made use of mobile medical resources without understanding which of these were evidence-based.

Keywords: Evidence-based medicine (EBM); Mobile applications; Physician; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Content of the used questionnaire
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mobile medical applications providing access to evidence-based medicine literature
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gordon G, John C, David C. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Evidence-based medicine working group. JAMA. 1992;268(17):2420–2425. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JPA. Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;73:82–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dutta S. Clinical epidemiology: principles, methods, and applications for clinical research. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(1):318–319. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn349. - DOI
    1. Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray J, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aguirre-Raya KA, Castilla-Peón MF, Barajas-Nava LA, Torres-Rodríguez V, Muñoz-Hernández O, Garduño-Espinosa J. Self-perception and knowledge of evidence based medicine by physicians. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0681-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources