Clinical utility of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in severe asthma management
- PMID: 31949116
- DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01633-2019
Clinical utility of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in severe asthma management
Abstract
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways, affecting over 350 million people worldwide and placing a significant burden on healthcare providers and wider society. Approximately 5-10% of asthma patients are diagnosed with severe asthma and typically are associated with increased risk of hospitalisation from exacerbations, increased morbidity, mortality and higher asthma-associated healthcare costs. Nitric oxide (NO) is an important regulator of immune responses and is a product of inflammation in the airways that is over-produced in asthma. Fractional exhaled NO (F eNO) is predominantly used as a predictor of response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), to monitor adherence and as a diagnostic tool in ICS-naïve patients. In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of F eNO for the initial diagnosis of patients with suspected asthma. In the USA, American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines recommend F eNO as part of the initial diagnosis of asthma and for monitoring of airway inflammation. F eNO has also been shown to be a predictive factor for asthma exacerbations, with higher levels being associated with a greater number of exacerbations. In addition, higher levels of F eNO have been shown to be associated with a decline in lung function. F eNO testing is a cost-effective procedure and has been shown to improve patient management when combined with standard assessment methods. Recent evidence suggests that F eNO may also be useful as a surrogate biomarker for the assessment and management of severe asthma and to predict responsiveness to some biological therapies.
Copyright ©ERS 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: A.Menzies-Gow reports attending advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi and Teva; he has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Teva and Vectura, and participated in research for which his host institution has been remunerated by AstraZeneca; he has attended international conferences sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim and Teva, and has consultancy agreements with AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Vectura. Conflict of interest: A.H. Mansur reports an educational grant for service support from AstraZeneca; and fees for talks and advisory group contributions and conference attendance from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C.E. Brightling reports non-financial (writing/editorial) support from Sanofi Genzyme Inc., UK, during the conduct of the study; grants from Air-PROM, Medical Research Council UK, and National Institute for Health Research UK; grants and personal fees from 4DPharma, AstraZeneca/Medimmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer, Mologic, Novartis, Roche/Genentech and Sanofi/Regeneron; personal fees from Gilead, Pfizer, PreP, Teva, Theravance and Vectura, outside the submitted work.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical