Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec;10(6):1222-1228.
doi: 10.21037/jgo.2019.04.01.

Robotic surgery in colorectal cancer: the way forward or a passing fad

James Chi-Yong Ngu  1 , Seon-Hahn Kim  2
Affiliations
Review

Robotic surgery in colorectal cancer: the way forward or a passing fad

James Chi-Yong Ngu et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Introduced mainly to overcome the technical limitations of laparoscopy, robotic colorectal surgery (CRS) has been touted to provide superior optics, ergonomics, and surgeon autonomy. This technological advancement is nonetheless associated with certain drawbacks, mainly involving its cost and the lack of unequivocal benefit over conventional laparoscopy. In this era of evidence-based medicine, robotic CRS remains predominantly a subject of individual institution case series, retrospective studies, matched comparisons at best, and repeated reviews of the above literature. This article provides a critique of the more contemporary data regarding the use of robotics in colorectal cancer surgery and the controversies surrounding the literature.

Keywords: Surgery; cancer; colorectal; laparoscopy; robot.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983;15:59-64. 10.1055/s-2007-1021466 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991;1:144-50. - PubMed
    1. Ngu JC, Tsang CB, Koh DC. The da Vinci Xi: a review of its capabilities, versatility, and potential role in robotic colorectal surgery. Robot Surg 2017;4:77-85. 10.2147/RSRR.S119317 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2018;267:1034-46. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002523 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, et al. Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS 2009;13:176-83. - PMC - PubMed