Preliminary experience with an image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty: 77 cases compared with a matched control group
- PMID: 31950265
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02624-3
Preliminary experience with an image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty: 77 cases compared with a matched control group
Abstract
Background: Achieving an optimal limb alignment is an important factor affecting the long-term survival of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This is the first study to look at the limb alignment and orientation of components in TKA using a novel image-free handheld robotic sculpting system.
Methods: This case-controlled study retrospectively compared limb and component alignment of 77 TKAs performed with a robot (Robot-group) with a matched control group of patients who received conventional alignment with intramedular rods (Control group). Alignment and component positioning was measured on full-leg weight-bearing and standard lateral X-rays by two independent observers. The image-free handheld robotic sculpting system calculated the planned and achieved mechanical axis (MA). Outliers were defined as > 3° deviation from planned alignment.
Results: Mean MA was 180.1° (SD = 1.9) in the Robot-group, compared to the Control group with a mean MA of 179.1° (SD = 3.1, p = 0.028). We observed 5 outliers (6%) in the Robot-group and 14 outliers (18%, p = 0.051) in the Control group. Fraction of outliers of the frontal tibial component was 0% in the Robot-group versus 8% in the Control group (p = 0.038). There were no other statistical differences regarding the implant positioning between both groups.
Conclusion: The Robot-group showed significantly less outliers compared to the conventional technique. Whether these differences are clinically relevant is questionable and should be investigated on the long term. Randomized controlled trials with larger patient series will be needed in the future to confirm our preliminary results.
Keywords: Alignment; Image-free handheld; Knee; NAVIO; Outliers; Precision freehand sculpting system; Robot; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(2):86-95. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408. Comput Aided Surg. 2012. PMID: 22348661
-
Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Oct;21(10):2206-12. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2620-y. Epub 2013 Aug 9. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013. PMID: 23928929 Clinical Trial.
-
Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty achieves better postoperative alignment compared to conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in a low-volume setting.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Nov;104(7):971-975. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 25. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 29704634
-
No differences in mid- to long-term outcomes of computer-assisted navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Oct;28(10):3183-3192. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05808-5. Epub 2019 Nov 29. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. PMID: 31784782 Review.
-
Comparison of iASSIST Navigation System with Conventional Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes.Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(6):985-993. doi: 10.1111/os.12550. Epub 2019 Nov 22. Orthop Surg. 2019. PMID: 31755245 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is accurate in vivo: a retrospective study to measure the postoperative bone resection and alignment.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3471-3479. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04648-2. Epub 2022 Oct 21. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 36269397
-
Two- and three-dimensional evaluations following handheld robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty.J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 10;18(1):70. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01827-8. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38340201
-
Where are We Now and What are We Hoping to Achieve with Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.Orthop Res Rev. 2022 Oct 17;14:339-349. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S294369. eCollection 2022. Orthop Res Rev. 2022. PMID: 36274930 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improved accuracy of implant placement with an imageless handheld robotic system compared to conventional instrumentation in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial using CT-based assessment of radiological outcomes.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5446-5452. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07590-x. Epub 2023 Oct 5. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023. PMID: 37796307 Clinical Trial.
-
Femoral resection accuracy and precision in manual caliper-verified kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty.J Exp Orthop. 2025 Apr 17;12(2):e70234. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70234. eCollection 2025 Apr. J Exp Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40256668 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical