Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;96(3):669-680.
doi: 10.1111/jfb.14258. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

Predation risk and competition affect habitat use of adult perch, Perca fluviatilis

Affiliations

Predation risk and competition affect habitat use of adult perch, Perca fluviatilis

Christina Henseler et al. J Fish Biol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine how the presence of a predator and an interspecific competitor influence the habitat use of adult perch (Perca fluviatilis; size: 15.1 ± 0.5 cm) when given the choice between two adjacent habitats. By conducting aquarium experiments, the habitat occupancy of P. fluviatilis was documented in the presence and absence of a predator (pike Esox lucius; size: 25.4 ± 2.1 cm) and a potential competitor (ruffe Gymnocephalus cernuus; size: 14.1 ± 0.3 cm) fish species. Two P. fluviatilis individuals generally shared the same habitat. In the presence of a conspecific, P. fluviatilis favoured the structurally more-complex, artificial macrophyte habitat over the less-structured rock and sand habitat, which in turn were used equally. In the predator- and competitor treatments, P. fluviatilis seemed to adapt their habitat use to the habitat occupancy of E. lucius and G. cernuus in the Macrophyte vs. Rock and, in the predator treatment, also in the Macrophyte vs. Sand habitat combination, by increasingly occupying a habitat that was used less by the predator or competitor species, respectively. This behaviour suggests that P. fluviatilis tried to avoid the other fish species by choosing a, in some cases less preferred, predator- or competitor-free habitat. This study emphasizes the importance of biological interactions illustrated by the potential of predation risk and competition to structure fish communities by influencing habitat use at small spatial scales.

Keywords: competition, fish community, habitats, Perca fluviatilis, predation, structural complexity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Anderson, O. (1984). Optimal foraging by largemouth bass in structured environments. Ecology, 65, 851-861.
    1. Bean, C. W., & Winfield, I. J. (1995). Habitat use and activity patterns of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.)), perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and pike (Esox lucius L.) in the laboratory: the role of predation threat and structural complexity. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 4, 37-46.
    1. Bergman, E. (1987). Temperature-dependent differences in foraging ability of two percids, Perca fluviatilis and Gymnocephalus cernuus. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 19, 45-53.
    1. Bergman, E. (1988). Foraging abilities and niche breadths of two percids, Perca fluviatilis and Gymnocephalus cernua, under different environmental conditions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 57, 443-453.
    1. Bergman, E. (1991). Changes in abundance of two percids, Perca fluviatilis and Gymnocephalus cernuus, along a productivity gradient: Relations to feeding strategies and competitive abilities. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48, 536-545.

LinkOut - more resources