Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Feb 18;323(7):616-626.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22190.

Effect of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis With Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers on In-Hospital Mortality Among ICU Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: The PEPTIC Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis With Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers on In-Hospital Mortality Among ICU Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: The PEPTIC Randomized Clinical Trial

PEPTIC Investigators for the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group, Alberta Health Services Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network, and the Irish Critical Care Trials Group et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor blockers (H2RBs) are often prescribed for patients as stress ulcer prophylaxis drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU). The comparative effect of these drugs on mortality is unknown.

Objective: To compare in-hospital mortality rates using PPIs vs H2RBs for stress ulcer prophylaxis.

Design, setting, and participants: Cluster crossover randomized clinical trial conducted at 50 ICUs in 5 countries between August 2016 and January 2019. Patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation within 24 hours of ICU admission were followed up for 90 days at the hospital.

Interventions: Two stress ulcer prophylaxis strategies were compared (preferential use with PPIs vs preferential use with H2RBs). Each ICU used each strategy sequentially for 6 months in random order; 25 ICUs were randomized to the sequence with use of PPIs and then use of H2RBs and 25 ICUs were randomized to the sequence with use of H2RBs and then use of PPIs (13 436 patients randomized by site to PPIs and 13 392 randomized by site to H2RBs).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days during index hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Clostridioides difficile infection, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay.

Results: Among 26 982 patients who were randomized, 154 opted out, and 26 828 were analyzed (mean [SD] age, 58 [17.0] years; 9691 [36.1%] were women). There were 26 771 patients (99.2%) included in the mortality analysis; 2459 of 13 415 patients (18.3%) in the PPI group died at the hospital by day 90 and 2333 of 13 356 patients (17.5%) in the H2RB group died at the hospital by day 90 (risk ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.10]; absolute risk difference, 0.93 percentage points [95% CI, -0.01 to 1.88] percentage points; P = .054). An estimated 4.1% of patients randomized by ICU site to PPIs actually received H2RBs and an estimated 20.1% of patients randomized by ICU site to H2RBs actually received PPIs. Clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 1.3% of the PPI group and 1.8% of the H2RB group (risk ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.92]; absolute risk difference, -0.51 percentage points [95% CI, -0.90 to -0.12 percentage points]; P = .009). Rates of Clostridioides difficile infection and ICU and hospital lengths of stay were not significantly different by treatment group. One adverse event (an allergic reaction) was reported in 1 patient in the PPI group.

Conclusions and relevance: Among ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation, a strategy of stress ulcer prophylaxis with use of proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor blockers resulted in hospital mortality rates of 18.3% vs 17.5%, respectively, a difference that did not reach the significance threshold. However, study interpretation may be limited by crossover in the use of the assigned medication.

Trial registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616000481471.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Bagshaw reported receiving grants and personal fees from Baxter; and personal fees from Spectral Medical and CNA Diagnostics. Dr Beasley reported receiving grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Screening, Randomization, and Follow-up of Participants in the PEPTIC Randomized Trial
One intensive care unit (ICU) randomized to the sequence of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) first and then histamine-2 receptor blockers (H2RBs) contributed 46 patients to the H2RB group but did not contribute patients to the PPI group because it did not contribute to the registry for treatment period 1. As shown in eFigure 2 in Supplement 2, patients in a small number of sites received both PPIs and H2RBs, and a small number of patients distributed across multiple sites received no stress ulcer prophylaxis. aDefined by the presence of a registry ICU admission code indicating that the patient was admitted to the ICU with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Cumulative Incidence of In-Hospital Mortality
A total of 2459 of 13 415 patients (18.3%) in the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) group and 2333 of 13 356 patients (17.5%) in the histamine-2 receptor blocker (H2RB) group died at the hospital by day 90 (risk ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.10]; absolute risk difference, 0.93 [95% CI, −0.01 to 1.88] percentage points; P = .054). The median observation time was 7.99 days (interquartile range, 4.79 to 17.0 days) in the PPI group vs 8.03 days (interquartile range, 4.82 to 17.0 days) in the H2RB group. Curve truncated at 40 days beyond which less than 10% of the study population remained at risk.

Comment in

References

    1. Krag M, Perner A, Wetterslev J, et al. ; SUP-ICU Coauthors . Prevalence and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding and use of acid suppressants in acutely ill adult intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(5):833-845. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3725-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krag M, Marker S, Perner A, et al. ; SUP-ICU Trial Group . Pantoprazole in patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(23):2199-2208. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1714919 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbateskovic M, Marker S, Granholm A, et al. . Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamin-2 receptor antagonists in adult intensive care patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(2):143-158. doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05526-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Litton E, Eastwood GM, Bellomo R, et al. . A multicentre feasibility study evaluating stress ulcer prophylaxis using hospital-based registry data. Crit Care Resusc. 2014;16(3):158-163. - PubMed
    1. Eastwood GM, Litton E, Bellomo R, et al. . Opinions and practice of stress ulcer prophylaxis in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units. Crit Care Resusc. 2014;16(3):170-174. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Grants and funding