Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;34(4):408-415.
doi: 10.1111/ppe.12610. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

Validation of criteria to identify severe maternal morbidity

Katherine P Himes  1   2 , Lisa M Bodnar  2   3
Affiliations

Validation of criteria to identify severe maternal morbidity

Katherine P Himes et al. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Epidemiologic research on severe maternal morbidity often relies on a screening definition of the outcome because a gold standard approach requires medical record review.

Objective: To determine the validity of screening or identification criteria to classify cases of severe maternal morbidity using the definition of severe maternal morbidity proposed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).

Methods: From all singleton deliveries at Magee-Womens Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (2010-2011; n = 19 307), we selected all deliveries that had at least one screening or identification criteria for severe maternal morbidity (n = 349) and a random sample of deliveries with no case identification criteria (n = 349). Screen-positive deliveries were a delivery with any of the following: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision diagnosis and procedure codes for the identification of severe maternal morbidity; prolonged post-partum length of stay; or maternal intensive care unit admission. We identified true cases through detailed chart review using the suggested diagnoses in the 2016 ACOG and SMFM Obstetric Care Consensus on severe maternal morbidity. We calculated the positive and negative predictive values of the screening criteria.

Results: Approximately 1.8% of deliveries screened positive for severe maternal morbidity. After medical record review, 166 screen-positive deliveries were true cases (48% positive predictive value), and 347 screen-negative cases were true negatives (99% negative predictive value). Two screen-negative cases were false negatives. If we applied the negative predictive value to the population, 109 true cases would be missed with these criteria.

Conclusion: The criteria we used to identify potential cases of severe acute maternal morbidity had poor performance in our cohort. In the absence of resources to apply the gold standard outcome definition to a large population, validation data and analytic strategies that incorporate measurement error are essential to estimate the direction and magnitude of the resulting bias.

Keywords: identification criteria; screening criteria; severe acute maternal morbidity; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. Callaghan WM. Overview of maternal mortality in the United States. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36:2-6.
    1. Cochet L, Pattinson RC, Macdonald AP. Severe acute maternal morbidity and maternal death audit-a rapid diagnostic tool for evaluating maternal care. S Afr Med J. 2003;93:700-702.
    1. Pattinson RC, Hall M. Near misses: a useful adjunct to maternal death enquiries. Br Med Bull. 2003;67:231-243.
    1. Belfort MA, Clark SL, Saade GR, et al. Hospital readmission after delivery: evidence for an increased incidence of nonurogenital infection in the immediate postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(35):e31-37.
    1. Kuklina E, Callaghan W. Chronic heart disease and severe obstetric morbidity among hospitalisations for pregnancy in the USA: 1995-2006. BJOG. 2011;118:345-352.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources