Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Jul;99(7):875-883.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.13808. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

Low-dose-aspirin usage among women with an increased preeclampsia risk: A prospective cohort study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Low-dose-aspirin usage among women with an increased preeclampsia risk: A prospective cohort study

Pim van Montfort et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Low-dose aspirin (LDA) prophylaxis has been shown to reduce women's preeclampsia risk. Evidence regarding LDA adherence rates of pregnant women is based almost exclusively on clinical trials, giving a potentially biased picture. Moreover, these studies do not report on determinants of adherence. Since 2017, obstetric healthcare professionals in a Dutch region have assessed women's preeclampsia risk by means of a prediction tool and counseled those with an above-population average risk on LDA as a prophylactic measure.

Material and methods: From 2017 to 2018, 865 women were recruited in multiple centers and prospectively followed using web-based surveys (Expect Study II). Rates and determinants of LDA usage among women with an increased preeclampsia risk in daily practice were assessed. Results were compared with findings in a similar cohort from a care-as-usual setting lacking risk-based counseling (Expect Study I, n = 2614). Netherlands Trial Register NTR4143.

Results: In total, 306 women had a predicted increased preeclampsia risk. LDA usage was higher for women receiving risk-based care than care-as-usual (29.4% vs 1.5%, odds ratio 19.1, 95% confidence interval 11.2-32.5). Daily LDA usage was positively correlated with both predicted risk and women's concerns regarding preeclampsia. Most reported reasons for non- or incomplete use were unawareness of LDA as a preventive intervention, concerns about potential adverse effects and doubts regarding the benefits.

Conclusions: Risk-based counseling was associated with a higher prevalence of LDA usage, but general usage rates were low. Future research regarding potential factors improving the usage of LDA during pregnancy is necessary.

Keywords: adherence; aspirin; preeclampsia; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart participant enrollment of Expect Study II
Figure 2
Figure 2
Women’s intentions regarding low‐dose aspirin (LDA) usage after risk‐based counseling and reported LDA usage
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimated preeclampsia risks and low‐dose aspirin usage rates by women receiving care‐as‐usual or risk‐based care [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Mol BWJ, Roberts CT, Thangaratinam S, Magee LA, de Groot CJM, Hofmeyr GJ. Pre‐eclampsia. Lancet. 2016;387:999‐1011. - PubMed
    1. Roberge S, Bujold E, Nicolaides KH. Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:287‐293.e1. - PubMed
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Lawrie TA, Atallah AN, Torloni MR. Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(10):CD001059. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen R, Rogozinska E, Sivarajasingam P, Khan KS, Thangaratinam S. Effect of diet‐ and lifestyle‐based metabolic risk‐modifying interventions on preeclampsia: a meta‐analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:973‐985. - PubMed
    1. Roberge S, Nicolaides K, Demers S, Hyett J, Chaillet N, Bujold E. The role of aspirin dose on the prevention of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:110‐120.e6. - PubMed

Publication types