Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;91(6):1343-1352.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.051. Epub 2020 Jan 15.

Cold snare piecemeal EMR of large sessile colonic polyps ≥20 mm (with video)

Affiliations

Cold snare piecemeal EMR of large sessile colonic polyps ≥20 mm (with video)

Dileep Mangira et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Background and aims: Conventional EMR using a hot snare is the standard of care for resection of large (≥20 mm) nonmalignant sessile colonic polyps. Serious adverse events are predominantly because of electrocautery. This could potentially be avoided by cold snare piecemeal EMR (CSP-EMR). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CSP-EMR of sessile colonic polyps sized ≥20 mm.

Methods: All cases of CSP-EMR at 5 Australian academic hospitals for sessile polyps ≥20 mm over a 2-year period, from January 2016 to December 2017, were identified retrospectively. Efficacy was defined as the absence of residual or recurrent polyp tissue during the first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1) and second surveillance colonoscopy (SC2). Clinically significant intraprocedural or delayed adverse events and surveillance colonoscopy findings were assessed by reviewing medical records.

Results: CSP-EMR was performed on 204 polyps sized ≥20 mm in 186 patients (men, 33.8%; median age, 68 years). SC1 for 164 polyps (80.4%) at a median interval of 150 days showed residual or recurrent polyp in 9 cases (5.5%; 95% confidence interval, 3%-11%). SC2 for 113 polyps (72.9%) at a median interval of 18 months showed late residual or recurrent polyp in 4 cases (3.5%; 95% confidence interval, .9%-8.5%) after a normal SC1. Intraprocedural bleeding was successfully treated in 4 patients (2.2%), whereas 7 patients (3.8%) experienced self-limited clinically significant post-EMR bleeding and 1 patient (.5%) required overnight observation for nonspecific abdominal pain that resolved spontaneously. None experienced other adverse events.

Conclusions: CSP-EMR of sessile colonic polyps ≥20 mm is technically feasible, effective, and safe. The adverse event rate and polyp recurrence rate were low. Randomized or large prospective trials are required to confirm the noninferiority and improved safety of CSP-EMR compared with conventional EMR and to further determine the polyp morphologies that are best suited for CSP-EMR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Cold snare piecemeal EMR of large sessile colonic polyps >20 mm: a call for dedicated snares.
    Bronswijk M, Demedts I, Bisschops R, Roelandt P. Bronswijk M, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Nov;92(5):1141-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.059. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020. PMID: 33160498 No abstract available.
  • Response.
    Mangira D, Cameron K, Simons K, Zanati S, LaNauze R, Raftopoulos S, Brown G, Moss A. Mangira D, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Nov;92(5):1142-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.064. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020. PMID: 33160499 No abstract available.

LinkOut - more resources