Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2017 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- PMID: 31956280
- PMCID: PMC6955594
- DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12307
Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2017 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract
Purpose: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) has collected cycle-based assisted reproductive technology (ART) data in an online registry since 2007. Herein, we present the characteristics and treatment outcomes of ART cycles registered during 2017.
Methods: We collected cycle-specific information for all ART cycles implemented at participating facilities and performed descriptive analysis.
Results: In total, 448,210 treatment cycles and 56,617 neonates (1 in 16.7 neonates born in Japan) were reported in 2017, increased from 2016; the number of initiated fresh cycles decreased for the first time ever. The mean patient age was 38.0 years (standard deviation 4.6). A total 110,641 of 245,205 egg retrieval cycles (45.1%) were freeze-all cycles; fresh embryo transfer (ET) was performed in 55,720 cycles. A total 194,415 frozen-thawed ET cycles were reported, resulting in 66,881 pregnancies and 47,807 neonates born. Single ET (SET) was performed in 81.8% of fresh transfers and 83.4% of frozen cycles, with singleton pregnancy/live birth rates of 97.5%/97.3% and 96.7%/96.6%, respectively.
Conclusions: Total ART cycles and subsequent live births increased continuously in 2017, whereas the number of initiated fresh cycles decreased. SET was performed in over 80% of cases, and ET shifted from using fresh embryos to frozen ones.
Keywords: ART registry; Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; freeze‐all strategy; in vitro fertilization; intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
© 2019 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this study.
Figures


References
-
- Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Chambers GM, et al. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1067‐1080. - PubMed
-
- Chen Z‐J, Shi Y, Sun Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523‐533. - PubMed
-
- Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(1):2‐14. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources