The Role of Robotic Path Assistance and Weight Support in Facilitating 3D Movements in Individuals With Poststroke Hemiparesis
- PMID: 31959040
- DOI: 10.1177/1545968319887685
The Role of Robotic Path Assistance and Weight Support in Facilitating 3D Movements in Individuals With Poststroke Hemiparesis
Abstract
Background. High-intensity repetitive training is challenging to provide poststroke. Robotic approaches can facilitate such training by unweighting the limb and/or by improving trajectory control, but the extent to which these types of assistance are necessary is not known. Objective. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which robotic path assistance and/or weight support facilitate repetitive 3D movements in high functioning and low functioning subjects with poststroke arm motor impairment relative to healthy controls. Methods. Seven healthy controls and 18 subjects with chronic poststroke right-sided hemiparesis performed 300 repetitions of a 3D circle-drawing task using a 3D Cable-driven Arm Exoskeleton (CAREX) robot. Subjects performed 100 repetitions each with path assistance alone, weight support alone, and path assistance plus weight support in a random order over a single session. Kinematic data from the task were used to compute the normalized error and speed as well as the speed-error relationship. Results. Low functioning stroke subjects (Fugl-Meyer Scale score = 16.6 ± 6.5) showed the lowest error with path assistance plus weight support, whereas high functioning stroke subjects (Fugl-Meyer Scale score = 59.6 ± 6.8) moved faster with path assistance alone. When both speed and error were considered together, low functioning subjects significantly reduced their error and increased their speed but showed no difference across the robotic conditions. Conclusions. Robotic assistance can facilitate repetitive task performance in individuals with severe arm motor impairment, but path assistance provides little advantage over weight support alone. Future studies focusing on antigravity arm movement control are warranted poststroke.
Keywords: kinematics; learning curve; motor control; robotics; stroke rehabilitation; upper extremity.
Similar articles
-
Robotic Assistance for Training Finger Movement Using a Hebbian Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Aug;31(8):769-780. doi: 10.1177/1545968317721975. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017. PMID: 28803535 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Pattern of improvement in upper limb pointing task kinematics after a 3-month training program with robotic assistance in stroke.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Oct 13;14(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0315-1. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017. PMID: 29029633 Free PMC article.
-
Does assist-as-needed upper limb robotic therapy promote participation in repetitive activity-based motor training in sub-acute stroke patients with severe paresis?NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(1):31-39. doi: 10.3233/NRE-171454. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017. PMID: 28527224
-
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb After Stroke.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Feb;31(2):107-121. doi: 10.1177/1545968316666957. Epub 2016 Sep 24. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017. PMID: 27597165 Review.
-
Robot-Assisted Therapy for Upper Extremity Motor Impairment After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Phys Ther. 2021 Apr 4;101(4):pzab010. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab010. Phys Ther. 2021. PMID: 33454787
Cited by
-
A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Oct 19;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00763-6. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 33076952 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical