Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 20;9(1):8.
doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-0622-9.

Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review

Affiliations

Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review

Cheng Wang et al. Infect Dis Poverty. .

Abstract

Background: Crowdsourcing is used increasingly in health and medical research. Crowdsourcing is the process of aggregating crowd wisdom to solve a problem. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize quantitative evidence on crowdsourcing to improve health.

Methods: We followed Cochrane systematic review guidance and systematically searched seven databases up to September 4th 2019. Studies were included if they reported on crowdsourcing and related to health or medicine. Studies were excluded if recruitment was the only use of crowdsourcing. We determined the level of evidence associated with review findings using the GRADE approach.

Results: We screened 3508 citations, accessed 362 articles, and included 188 studies. Ninety-six studies examined effectiveness, 127 examined feasibility, and 37 examined cost. The most common purposes were to evaluate surgical skills (17 studies), to create sexual health messages (seven studies), and to provide layperson cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) out-of-hospital (six studies). Seventeen observational studies used crowdsourcing to evaluate surgical skills, finding that crowdsourcing evaluation was as effective as expert evaluation (low quality). Four studies used a challenge contest to solicit human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing promotion materials and increase HIV testing rates (moderate quality), and two of the four studies found this approach saved money. Three studies suggested that an interactive technology system increased rates of layperson initiated CPR out-of-hospital (moderate quality). However, studies analyzing crowdsourcing to evaluate surgical skills and layperson-initiated CPR were only from high-income countries. Five studies examined crowdsourcing to inform artificial intelligence projects, most often related to annotation of medical data. Crowdsourcing was evaluated using different outcomes, limiting the extent to which studies could be pooled.

Conclusions: Crowdsourcing has been used to improve health in many settings. Although crowdsourcing is effective at improving behavioral outcomes, more research is needed to understand effects on clinical outcomes and costs. More research is needed on crowdsourcing as a tool to develop artificial intelligence systems in medicine.

Trial registration: PROSPERO: CRD42017052835. December 27, 2016.

Keywords: Challenge contest; Crowdsourcing; Health; Innovation; Medicine; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of study selection data abstraction
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Process of using crowdsourcing to evaluate surgical performance
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Process of using crowdsourcing to increase HIV testing
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Process of using crowdsourcing to facilitate layperson CPR outside of the hospital. CPR: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; SMS: Short message service

References

    1. Tucker JD, Day S, Tang W, Bayus B. Crowdsourcing in medical research: concepts and applications. PeerJ. 2019;6:e6762. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6762. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooks SC. Community uptake of PulsePoint: Using smartphones to crowdsource basic life support for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. CJEM. 2013;15(Suppl):73. - PubMed
    1. Narikawa K, Sakamoto T, Kubota K, Suzukawa M, Yonekawa C, Yamashita K, et al. Predictability of the call triage protocol to detect if dispatchers should activate community first responders. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29:484–488. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14000995. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ringh M, Fredman D, Nordberg P, Stark T, Hollenberg J. Mobile phone technology identifies and recruits trained citizens to perform CPR on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims prior to ambulance arrival. Resuscitation. 2011;82:1514–1518. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ringh M, Rosenqvist M, Hollenberg J, Jonsson M, Fredman D, Nordberg P, et al. Mobile-phone dispatch of laypersons for CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2316–2325. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406038. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources