Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature
- PMID: 31960168
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03334-5
Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Purpose: The management of acetabular bone loss is a challenging problem in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and critically analyze indications, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of custom-made acetabular components in rTHA.
Methods: A systematic review of English literature was performed on Medline. Retrospective or prospective studies with minimum 2 years of follow-up (FU) were included. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. Rates of intra- or post-operative complications, aseptic loosening (AL), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), reoperations and re-revisions rates were extrapolated.
Results: 18 articles with a level of evidence of IV were included. Six hundred and thirty-four acetabular custom components (627 patients) with a mean FU of 58.6 ± 29.8 months were analyzed. The studies showed good clinical and functional outcomes. Custom-made acetabular components allowed a stable fixation with 94.0 ± 5.0% survival rate. The estimated rate of re-operations and re-revisions were 19.3 ± 17.3% and 5.2 ± 4.7%, respectively. The incidence of PJI was 4.0 ± 3.9%.
Conclusions: The acetabular custom-made implants represent a reliable solution for pelvic discontinuity and particular cases of bone loss classified as Paprosky Type IIIA-B or type III-IV according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons system where the feature of the defect cannot be handled with standard implants. This strategy allows to fit the implant to the residual host bone, bypassing the bony deficiency and restoring hip biomechanics. Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at mid-term follow-up are reported in literature.
Keywords: Acetabular bone defects; Custom-made acetabular implants; Paprosky classification; Pelvic discontinuity; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Triflanged acetabular custom-made component.
Similar articles
-
Mid-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Feb;140(2):263-273. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03318-0. Epub 2019 Dec 9. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020. PMID: 31820093
-
Clinical study of outcomes after revision surgery using porous titanium custom-made implants for severe acetabular septic bone defects.Int Orthop. 2020 Oct;44(10):1957-1964. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04623-9. Epub 2020 Jun 15. Int Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32542450
-
Risk factors for implant failure of custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss and combined pelvic discontinuity.Technol Health Care. 2022;30(3):703-711. doi: 10.3233/THC-202236. Technol Health Care. 2022. PMID: 34366301
-
Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes of Custom Triflange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2511-2518. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.032. Epub 2019 May 29. J Arthroplasty. 2019. PMID: 31213338
-
Outcomes of Acetabular Reconstructions for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Discontinuity: A Systematic Review.J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1145-1153.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.057. Epub 2019 Nov 4. J Arthroplasty. 2020. PMID: 31784362
Cited by
-
Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Jun;140(6):815-825. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03379-6. Epub 2020 Feb 25. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020. PMID: 32100108 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of custom 3D-printed acetabular components in revision arthroplasty for the management of extensive acetabular defects.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Dec 30;62:102869. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102869. eCollection 2025 Mar. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024. PMID: 39917720 Review.
-
Beyond type III Paprosky acetabular defects: are partial pelvic replacements with iliosacral fixation successful?Int Orthop. 2023 Sep;47(9):2253-2263. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05823-9. Epub 2023 May 5. Int Orthop. 2023. PMID: 37145143
-
Personalized digital simulation‑assisted acetabular component implantation in revision hip arthroplasty.Exp Ther Med. 2024 Mar 4;27(5):180. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12468. eCollection 2024 May. Exp Ther Med. 2024. PMID: 38515645 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Trends and Hotspots in Hip Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Study of Last Five-Year Publications.Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(8):493-501. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.70790.3313. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023. PMID: 37674701 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cavagnaro L, Formica M, Basso M, Zanirato A, Divano S, Felli L (2018) Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg 102(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0487-7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Burastero G, Basso M, Carrega G, Cavagnaro L, Chiarlone F, Salomone C, Papa G, Felli L (2017) Acetabular spacers in 2-stage hip revision: is it worth it? A single-centre retrospective study. Hip Int 27(2):187–192. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000446 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Osawa Y, Seki T, Takegami Y, Kusano T, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y (2019) Failed periacetabular osteotomy leads to acetabular defects during subsequent total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(5):729–734 - DOI
-
- Jakobs O, Schmidl S, Schoof B, Beckmann J, Gehrke T, Gebauer M (2016) Increased risk for extended acetabular reconstruction in failed hip resurfacing as compared to failed total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(3):413–424 - DOI
-
- Burastero G, Scarfì S, Ferraris C, Fresia C, Sessarego N, Fruscione F, Monetti F, Scarfò F, Schupbach P, Podestà M, Grappiolo G, Zocchi E (2010) The association of human mesenchymal stem cells with BMP-7 improves bone regeneration of critical-size segmental bone defects in athymic rats. Bone 47(1):117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.03.023 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical