Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature
- PMID: 31960168
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03334-5
Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Purpose: The management of acetabular bone loss is a challenging problem in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and critically analyze indications, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of custom-made acetabular components in rTHA.
Methods: A systematic review of English literature was performed on Medline. Retrospective or prospective studies with minimum 2 years of follow-up (FU) were included. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. Rates of intra- or post-operative complications, aseptic loosening (AL), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), reoperations and re-revisions rates were extrapolated.
Results: 18 articles with a level of evidence of IV were included. Six hundred and thirty-four acetabular custom components (627 patients) with a mean FU of 58.6 ± 29.8 months were analyzed. The studies showed good clinical and functional outcomes. Custom-made acetabular components allowed a stable fixation with 94.0 ± 5.0% survival rate. The estimated rate of re-operations and re-revisions were 19.3 ± 17.3% and 5.2 ± 4.7%, respectively. The incidence of PJI was 4.0 ± 3.9%.
Conclusions: The acetabular custom-made implants represent a reliable solution for pelvic discontinuity and particular cases of bone loss classified as Paprosky Type IIIA-B or type III-IV according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons system where the feature of the defect cannot be handled with standard implants. This strategy allows to fit the implant to the residual host bone, bypassing the bony deficiency and restoring hip biomechanics. Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at mid-term follow-up are reported in literature.
Keywords: Acetabular bone defects; Custom-made acetabular implants; Paprosky classification; Pelvic discontinuity; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Triflanged acetabular custom-made component.
References
-
- Cavagnaro L, Formica M, Basso M, Zanirato A, Divano S, Felli L (2018) Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg 102(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0487-7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Burastero G, Basso M, Carrega G, Cavagnaro L, Chiarlone F, Salomone C, Papa G, Felli L (2017) Acetabular spacers in 2-stage hip revision: is it worth it? A single-centre retrospective study. Hip Int 27(2):187–192. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000446 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Osawa Y, Seki T, Takegami Y, Kusano T, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y (2019) Failed periacetabular osteotomy leads to acetabular defects during subsequent total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(5):729–734 - DOI
-
- Jakobs O, Schmidl S, Schoof B, Beckmann J, Gehrke T, Gebauer M (2016) Increased risk for extended acetabular reconstruction in failed hip resurfacing as compared to failed total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(3):413–424 - DOI
-
- Burastero G, Scarfì S, Ferraris C, Fresia C, Sessarego N, Fruscione F, Monetti F, Scarfò F, Schupbach P, Podestà M, Grappiolo G, Zocchi E (2010) The association of human mesenchymal stem cells with BMP-7 improves bone regeneration of critical-size segmental bone defects in athymic rats. Bone 47(1):117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.03.023 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
