Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 21;22(1):e14890.
doi: 10.2196/14890.

Valuable Genomes: Taxonomy and Archetypes of Business Models in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing

Scott Thiebes #  1 , Philipp A Toussaint #  1 , Jaehyeon Ju  2 , Jae-Hyeon Ahn  3 , Kalle Lyytinen  4 , Ali Sunyaev  1
Affiliations

Valuable Genomes: Taxonomy and Archetypes of Business Models in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing

Scott Thiebes et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Recent progress in genome data collection and analysis technologies has led to a surge of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing services. Owing to the clinical value and sensitivity of genomic data, as well as uncertainty and hearsay surrounding business practices of DTC genetic testing service providers, DTC genetic testing has faced significant criticism by researchers and practitioners. Research in this area has centered on ethical and legal implications of providing genetic tests directly to consumers, but we still lack a more profound understanding of how businesses in the DTC genetic testing markets work and provide value to different stakeholders.

Objective: The aim of this study was to address the lack of knowledge concerning business models of DTC genetic testing services by systematically identifying the salient properties of various DTC genetic testing service business models as well as discerning dominant business models in the market.

Methods: We employed a 3-phased research approach. In phase 1, we set up a database of 277 DTC genetic testing services. In phase 2, we drew on these data as well as conceptual models of DTC genetic testing services and iteratively developed a taxonomy of DTC genetic testing service business models. In phase 3, we used a 2-stage clustering method to cluster the 277 services that we identified during phase 1 and derived 6 dominant archetypes of DTC genetic testing service business models.

Results: The contributions of this research are 2-fold. First, we provided a first of its kind, systematically developed taxonomy of DTC genetic testing service business models consisting of 15 dimensions in 4 categories. Each dimension comprises 2 to 5 characteristics and captures relevant aspects of DTC genetic testing service business models. Second, we derived 6 archetypes of DTC genetic testing service business models named as follows: (1) low-cost DTC genomics for enthusiasts, (2) high-privacy DTC genomics for enthusiasts, (3) specific information tests, (4) simple health tests, (5) basic low-value DTC genomics, and (6) comprehensive tests and low data processing.

Conclusions: Our analysis paints a much more complex business landscape in the DTC genetic testing market than previously anticipated. This calls for further research on business models and their effects that underlie DTC genetic testing services and invites specific regulatory interventions to protect consumers and level the playing field.

Keywords: cluster analysis; direct-to-consumer screening and testing; genetic privacy; genetic testing; genomics; taxonomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the taxonomy development iterations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshot of the 23andMe website from October 2019.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Screenshot of the DNA Diagnostics Center website from October 2019.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Screenshot of the Dante Labs website from October 2019.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Turrini M. Online Genomes: problematizing the disruptiveness of direct-to-consumer genetic tests. Sociol Compass. 2018;12(11):e12633. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12633. - DOI
    1. Wetterstrand K. National Human Genome Research Institute. 2016. [2018-05-02]. DNA Sequencing Costs: Data from the NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP) https://www.genome.gov/sequencingcostsdata/
    1. Ramos E, Weissman SM. The dawn of consumer-directed testing. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018 Mar;178(1):89–97. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31603. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Credence Research. 2018. [2018-05-02]. Global Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Market is growing with Double Digit CAGR https://www.credenceresearch.com/press/global-direct-to-consumer-genetic... .
    1. Hudson K, Javitt G, Burke W, Byers P. ASHG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):635–7. doi: 10.1086/521634. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms