Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 16;8(1):124.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8010124.

Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing of Mycoplasma bovis Isolates Derived from Western Canadian Feedlot Cattle

Affiliations

Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing of Mycoplasma bovis Isolates Derived from Western Canadian Feedlot Cattle

Murray Jelinski et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Mycoplasma bovis is particularly adept at evading the immune system, resulting in chronic infections of the lungs and joints of feedlot cattle. The chronicity of the lesions results in prolonged antimicrobial therapy, possibly exacerbating antimicrobial resistance. This cross-sectional study generated in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data on 211 M. bovis isolates recovered from 159 healthy, diseased, and dead cattle, spanning the period of 2006-2018. Nine antimicrobials commonly administered to western Canadian feedlot cattle were assessed. The data were analyzed with non-parametric statistical tests with a level of significance of p < 0.05 (two-tailed). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values tended to increase between the isolates from healthy versus dead cattle and over time (2006-2018). Isolates from dead versus healthy cattle were more likely to be resistant to tulathromycin, gamithromycin, tylosin and enrofloxacin. There was no difference in the distributions of the MICs generated from the isolates recovered from the lungs and joints (p ≥ 0.124) and the lungs and deep nasal passages (p ≥ 0.157) of the same animals.

Keywords: Canada; Mycoplasma bovis; antimicrobial; beef; feedlot; resistance; susceptibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Minimum inhibitory concentration distribution for M. bovis isolates from healthy (n = 43), diseased (n = 19), and dead (n = 97) cattle (n = 159). Tulathromycin (TUL; 0.25–256 µg/mL), gamithromycin (GAM; 0.25–256 µg/mL), tilmicosin (TIL; 1–256 µg/mL), tildipirosin (TIP; 0.12–128 µg/mL), tylosin tartrate (TYL; 1–128 µg/mL), enrofloxacin (ENRO; 0.12–128 µg/mL), florfenicol (FFN; 0.25–256 µg/mL), oxytetracycline (OXY; 0.5–16 µg/mL), chlortetracycline (CTET; 1–256 µg/mL).

References

    1. Griffin D., Chengappa M.M., Kuszak J., McVey D.S. Bacterial pathogens of the bovine respiratory disease complex. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. 2010;26:381–394. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.04.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panciera R.J., Confer A.W. Pathogenesis and pathology of bovine pneumonia. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2010;26:191–214. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.04.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nickell J.S., White B.J. Metaphylactic antimicrobial therapy for bovine respiratory disease in stocker and feedlot cattle. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. 2010;26:285–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.04.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brault S.A., Hannon S.J., Gow S.P., Otto S.J.G., Booker C.W., Morley P.S. Calculation of antimicrobial use indicators in beef feedlots—Effects of choice of metric and standardized values. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019;6:330. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00330. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brault S.A., Hannon S.J., Gow S.P., Warr B.N., Withell J., Song J., Williams C.M., Otto S.J.G., Booker C.W., Morley P.S. Antimicrobial use on 36 beef feedlots in western Canada: 2008–2012. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019;6:329. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00329. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources