Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jan 21;22(1):3.
doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-0870-7.

Psychosocial Interventions for Pain Management in Advanced Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Psychosocial Interventions for Pain Management in Advanced Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Marco Warth et al. Curr Oncol Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose of review: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effects of psychosocial interventions on pain in advanced cancer patients.

Recent findings: The included studies investigated the effects of relaxation techniques, cognitive-behavioral therapy, music therapy, mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions, and supportive-expressive group therapy. Overall, we found a small, but significant effect on pain intensity (d = - 0.29, CI = - 0.54 to - 0.05). Effect sizes were highly heterogeneous between studies. We did not find evidence for the superiority of any of the intervention types. However, psychosocial interventions may be more effective if they specifically targeted pain distress as the primary outcome. Although findings were mixed, psychosocial interventions can be recommended to complement comprehensive care to alleviate pain in patients facing an advanced or terminal stage of the disease. Future research should develop innovative interventions tailored specifically for pain relief.

Keywords: Cancer; Music therapy; Pain; Palliative care; Psychotherapy; Relaxation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Forest plot for pain intensity. CI, 95% confidence interval

References

    1. Van Den Beuken-Van Everdingen MHJ, Hochstenbach LMJ, Joosten EAJ, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Janssen DJA. Update on prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2016;51:1070–1090.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Potter J, Hami F, Bryan T, Quigley C. Symptoms in 400 patients referred to palliative care services: prevalence and patterns. Palliat Med. 2003;17:310–314. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm760oa. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klepstad P, Kaasa S, Cherny N, Hanks G, De Conno F, Torvik K, et al. Pain and pain treatments in European palliative care units. A cross sectional survey from the European Association for Palliative Care Research Network. Palliat Med. 2005;19:477–484. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1054oa. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nersesyan H, Slavin KV. Current approach to cancer pain management: availability and implications of different treatment options. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3:381–400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Cancer Pain Relief, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/37896/9241544821.pdf?se.... 1996), Accessed 2 July 2019.

Publication types