Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;26(4):2363-2369.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00178-5. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity

Lex Bouter  1   2
Affiliations

What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity

Lex Bouter. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

In many countries attention for fostering research integrity started with a misconduct case that got a lot of media exposure. But there is an emerging consensus that questionable research practices are more harmful due to their high prevalence. QRPs have in common that they can help to make study results more exciting, more positive and more statistically significant. That makes them tempting to engage in. Research institutions have the duty to empower their research staff to steer away from QRPs and to explain how they realize that in a Research Integrity Promotion Plan. Avoiding perverse incentives in assessing researchers for career advancement is an important element in that plan. Research institutions, funding agencies and journals should make their research integrity policies as evidence-based as possible. The dilemmas and distractions researchers face are real and universal. We owe it to society to collaborate and to do our utmost best to prevent QRPs and to foster research integrity.

Keywords: Fabrication; Falsification; Meta-research; Questionable research practices; Research integrity; Research misconduct.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Amsterdam Agenda. (2015). https://www.wcrif.org/documents/42-amsterdam-agenda/file. Accessed January 3, 2020.
    1. Anderson MS. Shifting perspectives on research integrity. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2019;13:459–460. doi: 10.1177/1556264618813737. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bagioli M, Kenney M, Martin BR, Walsh JP. Academic misconduct, misrepresentation and gaming: A reassessment. Research Policy. 2019;48:401–413. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.025. - DOI
    1. Bouter LM. Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018;96:143–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouter LM, Tijdink J, Axelsen N, Martinson BC, ter Riet G. Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: Results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2016;1:17. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources