Understanding the Bariatric Patient Perspective in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) Bariatric Study
- PMID: 31965490
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04404-8
Understanding the Bariatric Patient Perspective in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) Bariatric Study
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Understanding the Bariatric Patient Perspective in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) Bariatric Study.Obes Surg. 2020 May;30(5):1848. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04475-7. Obes Surg. 2020. PMID: 32064555
Abstract
Background: In 2016, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute funded the National Patient Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) Bariatric Study (PBS). Understanding the experience of postoperative patients was a key component of this study.
Methods: Nine focus groups were conducted in Southern California, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, and Ohio and in a national advocacy conference for patients with obesity. Participants were identified and recruited in both clinical and community settings. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach to identify global overarching themes.
Results: There were 76 focus group participants. Participants were mostly women (81.4%), had primarily undergone gastric sleeve (47.0%), were non-Hispanic white (51.4%), had some college education (44.3%), and made $100,000 annual income or less (65.7%). Qualitative findings included negative reactions patients received from friends, family, and co-workers once they disclosed that they had bariatric surgery to lose weight; and barriers to follow-up care included insurance coverage, emotional and situational challenges, and physical pain limiting mobility.
Conclusions: These findings confirm the other qualitative findings in this area. The approach to bariatric surgery should be expanded to provide long-term comprehensive care that includes in-depth postoperative lifetime monitoring of emotional and physical health.
Keywords: Healthcare; Qualitative.
References
-
- Khosravi-Largani M, Nojomi M, Aghili R, et al. Evaluation of all types of metabolic bariatric surgery and its consequences: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29:651–90. - DOI
-
- Ribaric G, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW. Diabetes and weight in comparative studies of bariatric surgery vs conventional medical therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2014;24:437–55. - DOI
-
- Gasoyan H, Tajeu G, Halpern MT, et al. Reasons for underutilization of bariatric surgery: the role of insurance benefit design. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:146–51. - DOI
-
- Ortega E, Morinigo R, Flores L, et al. Predictive factors of excess body weight loss 1 year after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1744–50. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical